Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders not ready to endorse Clinton: 'Stand up, be bolder' [View all]Response to CrowCityDem (Reply #5)
stopbush This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The loser telling the winner what to do. What a novel idea. Like the loser had a better plan to win
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#1
Sorry Bernie, but the loser doesn't get to dictate everything. It IS a BOLD platform. Enough.
RBInMaine
Jun 2016
#126
His supporters, most of them, a good majority of them, are now her supporters as well.
LuvLoogie
Jun 2016
#56
Voting for her isn't really the same as not supporting her. Your reluctant vote
LuvLoogie
Jun 2016
#106
I read her site. Another poster linked it and then deleted their post. It's not there.
Ash_F
Jun 2016
#139
How do you know "she wants establishment Republicans", did she send you an email expressing....
DonViejo
Jun 2016
#10
LBJ a progressive? Remember the Domino Theory? LBJ was the one that ramped up the war in Vietnam
redstateblues
Jun 2016
#57
No matter how you try to rationalize it, Sen Sanders and Hillary Clinton are miles apart.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#46
And I missed it. I just finished responding to a poster that claims that the Progressives are
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#107
Then she needs to drop the right wing policies on war, trade, prisons, etc
AgingAmerican
Jun 2016
#48
On what? Denying medical marijuana to those that need it? On fracking? On the TPP? On supporting
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#111
I would like to see H. Clinton be more progressive in the following areas:
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#133
LOL! She's really not in any "pickle." She's winning by wider margins every day, and
Squinch
Jun 2016
#17
Bold is meaningless. The goal is to be smarter. Trump is bold too. How's that working?
CrowCityDem
Jun 2016
#5
"I supported Sanders. I don't feel we are ready for a woman president yet." from the comments.
grossproffit
Jun 2016
#6
I know an older lady who won't vote for a woman president, but thinks a woman VP is ok.
grossproffit
Jun 2016
#38
Yes, I think I saw that comment. I think it was made by a female Clinton supporter.
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#16
Bernie is free to spend his own political capital as he sees fit. Hillary already has
LuvLoogie
Jun 2016
#114
"We aren't ready for a woman president and a woman vice-president"-comments were made here several
Chathamization
Jun 2016
#140
That may be so, but she really needs to excuse herself from exercising any influence whatsoever,
JudyM
Jun 2016
#60
The better her polling numbers get the more Bernie tells her what to do
BeyondGeography
Jun 2016
#31
I understand that you typically disagree w/ his statement, but the sexist claim has gotten old and
desmiller
Jun 2016
#82
It has definitely gotten old --Some day it will be a thing of the past
Evergreen Emerald
Jun 2016
#88
Absolutely correct, and he is a man who has sat out 11 Presidential elections since
R B Garr
Jun 2016
#97
He is going about it the wrong way and it is cutting into his "revolution "
AgadorSparticus
Jun 2016
#115
She's already made it clear which side she's on. Bernie needs do the same. -nt-
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#113
I thought that was a demeaning thing to say to the presumptive Dem nominee!!
riversedge
Jun 2016
#118
Sanders? Sanders? Wait, that name rings a bell...but I can't really place it.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#120