2016 Postmortem

runaway hero

(835 posts)

11. Some Bonus

Mon Jul 25, 2016, 11:19 AM

Jul 2016

Still, Obama didn’t get involved at all as Wasserman Schultz was at the brink. Whenever the topic of replacing her came up, despite the fact that the president had lost patience with her years ago and generally avoided having to talk to her, he’d always felt that forcing her out wasn't worth the trouble it would bring.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/debbie-wasserman-schultz-dnc-226100#ixzz4FRDaN4Bw
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary wanted DWS gone last year. [View all] runaway hero Jul 2016 OP

the knives are out nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #1

yup... runaway hero Jul 2016 #2

So we are to believe that Obama wouldn't let DWS go, because he didn't want her criticizing him? Avalux Jul 2016 #3

Plus last year was already one of Presidents last term! mylye2222 Jul 2016 #8

I don't believe this either yeoman6987 Jul 2016 #30

It can be tough to believe anything that doesn't gently stroke one's bias. LanternWaste Jul 2016 #64

Not mentioned in article was she was a co chair of HRC's 2008 campaign karynnj Jul 2016 #31

Come on LoverOfLiberty Jul 2016 #37

But the Clinton people want it both ways karynnj Jul 2016 #47

I personally don't think it is wise to throw her to the lions LoverOfLiberty Jul 2016 #54

I agree and thought that was the position the Clinton team had taken by giving her the position they karynnj Jul 2016 #57

I agree runaway hero Jul 2016 #58

Interesting read. NurseJackie Jul 2016 #4

DU wanted her gone long before that. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2016 #5

Gone as in to work on the Clinton campaign? Orsino Jul 2016 #6

My thoughts exactly. If this is true, why does she have any position in the campaign? Matt_in_STL Jul 2016 #7

Agree here mylye2222 Jul 2016 #9

Maybe Hillary is trying to appear grateful PatSeg Jul 2016 #12

Perhaps the appearance of rancor was judged more harmful... Orsino Jul 2016 #16

That makes sense too PatSeg Jul 2016 #21

I bet she knows a lot of things runaway hero Jul 2016 #22

Yes PatSeg Jul 2016 #29

Yup runaway hero Jul 2016 #38

Most definitely PatSeg Jul 2016 #43

However, if she uses anything that way ... it destroys her future more than anyone else's. nt karynnj Jul 2016 #34

For some strange reason PatSeg Jul 2016 #46

If she loses the primary runaway hero Jul 2016 #56

To allow her to move to something that might still be considered dignified Bad Thoughts Jul 2016 #23

This is entertaining. jalan48 Jul 2016 #10

Some Bonus runaway hero Jul 2016 #11

That is pretty much PatSeg Jul 2016 #17

Brutal runaway hero Jul 2016 #18

I know PatSeg Jul 2016 #25

Obama could have got something for her runaway hero Jul 2016 #26

I'll bet Pay Day Loans PatSeg Jul 2016 #36

Or healthcare company chairman runaway hero Jul 2016 #40

Or maybe Reince Priebus PatSeg Jul 2016 #49

Not bad runaway hero Jul 2016 #53

LOL okay... HerbChestnut Jul 2016 #13

Hillary wants peace. runaway hero Jul 2016 #19

Then I would love to play her in a game of chess HerbChestnut Jul 2016 #24

Of course runaway hero Jul 2016 #27

How could it possibly be worse? HerbChestnut Jul 2016 #41

I agree with you runaway hero Jul 2016 #52

I'm totally confused... jham123 Jul 2016 #33

Repeat after me LoverOfLiberty Jul 2016 #39

No.... jham123 Jul 2016 #45

peace as a strategy, interesting concept. Hiraeth Jul 2016 #48

I think so runaway hero Jul 2016 #59

I'll bet HRC had to promise her liberalmuse Jul 2016 #14

like, maybe ... a job ... Hiraeth Jul 2016 #44

About the only thing I believe in this piece is that part of the problem lies with the Obama team. Tatiana Jul 2016 #15

She has been one for a while... tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #32

What's astonishing is that she took positions completely opposite President Obama's... Tatiana Jul 2016 #60

Oh absolutely PatSeg Jul 2016 #35

Wow, interesting to see who is blaming whom karynnj Jul 2016 #20

Podesta is a nasty guy runaway hero Jul 2016 #51

The trouble? tallahasseedem Jul 2016 #28

yeah, right. Hiraeth Jul 2016 #42

Kick n/t lillypaddle Jul 2016 #50

DWS has become a liability. Third Doctor Jul 2016 #55

I believe the old Clinton favorite -- Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2016 #61

Maybe with Hillary at this point it's a case of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer, kestrel91316 Jul 2016 #62

That is absolute bullshit choie Jul 2016 #63