Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
14. YES. ...after a question is answered-
Fri May 10, 2013, 07:27 AM
May 2013

does requesting one mean one has to send that in and not vote?
Want to make sure before saying a definite here
Can you request, not send it in and still go to polls if you don't?

Remember in Sandy, how long it took to count all the 2012 votes.
and yes, NJ and NY both can now pencil in two storms in both Sept. and Oct like the last 2 years.

(and remember, on 9-11-2001, that was an election day and voting already had started that morning and the election was postponed, and it was a mess).Rudy actually tried to cancel the elections that year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeppers JustAnotherGen May 2013 #1
I didn't/won't vote for him. But he is polling 75% in New Jersey. graham4anything May 2013 #3
Yeah JustAnotherGen May 2013 #4
At the least, we need to win every other office, and look at Bradley-Whitman. graham4anything May 2013 #6
And with shifting weather JustAnotherGen May 2013 #7
Yes, agreed one needs though to vote straight 100% democratic no matter who the (D) is. graham4anything May 2013 #12
the ads against Christie have already started too tabbycat31 May 2013 #24
Don't believe those polls remember Whitman vs. Florio bigdarryl May 2013 #10
There is D vs R, and there is NJ vs the rest of the world Cosmocat May 2013 #11
Christy praised the President following Sandy. rdharma May 2013 #28
Demonstrating that he is still a fucking republican liberal N proud May 2013 #2
NJ though already has a 100% mail in or absentee vote for anyone who wants to. graham4anything May 2013 #5
So JustAnotherGen May 2013 #8
YES. ...after a question is answered- graham4anything May 2013 #14
I think it would have to JustAnotherGen May 2013 #17
Every opportunity to put bills in front of him to show how republican he really is will be a win for okaawhatever May 2013 #9
So Much For Being An Advocate For Democracy - Just Another Republican Diminishing The Right To Vote cantbeserious May 2013 #13
Hello mtasselin May 2013 #15
what could possibly be wrong with more representation? RedstDem May 2013 #16
Hey, that was MY question! Why on earth did Christie do this? CTyankee May 2013 #18
Because he's a ARROGANT PRICK!!!!! bigdarryl May 2013 #19
Yes, but usually he has a "cover" for his arrogance... CTyankee May 2013 #21
he's showing his partisanship tabbycat31 May 2013 #25
I guess he's afraid of the big bad voter FRAUD... CTyankee May 2013 #26
And I wish the media would stop portraying this guy as a moderate tabbycat31 May 2013 #27
Democrats who are falling for this jerk ought to be ashamed of themselves! Wake up, Democrats!!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #20
and wait til women get the full story on his anti-choice views... CTyankee May 2013 #22
AND...anti-gay, pro-school vouchers stance, not to mention the horrible treatment of public workers. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Christy vetos early votin...»Reply #14