Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)
17. Isn't that the Sec of State?
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 09:48 PM
Sep 2013

Really, shouldn't a Secretary of Peace be a rough equivalent of the Secretary of State? Isn't that really what diplomacy should be about in the modern age? I'll admit that's not the way it is working right now but if Obama really wanted to make a legacy, it would be to drive the State Department away from justifying wars and towards avoiding them. It is strange to see the Kerry up testifying in support of military action in Syria. Shouldn't that be the Sec Def? Shouldn't a Secretary of State be the guy providing options NOT to go to war?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DEPT. OF PEACE - a fittin...»Reply #17