Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Response to irisblue (Reply #33)
KMOD This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why don't we wait and see who wins the primaries, before demanding the loyalty pledge?
djean111
Jul 2015
#1
The whole point of loyalty pledges is coercing people into doing something they
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#2
And instead of answering my question, you opt for another round of browbeating.
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#28
I have a problem with people regurgitating the same lectures over and over again,
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#54
If you have to demand of people why they're here, you don't "get it".
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#137
AGREE ... Should she win the nomination, and some still can't get behind it, THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE
trueblue2007
Jul 2015
#52
Oh, then I must have missed the gushing over the qualifications of those other guys.
djean111
Jul 2015
#16
As the OP said, or hinted, or implied...what option is there regardless of who wins our primaries?
George II
Jul 2015
#27
As I don't agree with your gushing assessment of the current frontrunner
whatchamacallit
Jul 2015
#3
Agreed. We will go down as fools if we allow the GOP the WH, SCOTUS, etc.(VIDEO)
freshwest
Jul 2015
#41
"I wouldn't want to be around to explain to my grandchildren that their world is so screwed up
Cha
Jul 2015
#61
"I see no insults or disruptive content about the post. I don't have to agree with the content of
Cha
Jul 2015
#67
I will not vote against the Democratic presidential nominee in the 2016 presidential election
tularetom
Jul 2015
#34
Thank you sir. Your finger-waggling done did me good. Can't wait for tomorrow's scolding.
Scootaloo
Jul 2015
#55
When you're devoted to a theology that money is all that matters, it's what happens.
Scootaloo
Jul 2015
#92
"This is not a freaking game. The White House, the Supreme Court, and our civil rights are at stake"
Cha
Jul 2015
#80
Why only two choices? A country with over 300 million people has only two choices!
akbacchus_BC
Jul 2015
#94
Wasserman-Schultz is not letting anyone but Third Wayer types get past local.
djean111
Jul 2015
#129