Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Cha
(297,196 posts)80. "This is not a freaking game. The White House, the Supreme Court, and our civil rights are at stake"
Fact.
Got to mention our very existence with our Environment, too, KMOD.
We had some posters on here after the midterm elections bragging about not voting.. showing off they didn't have a clue about our Environment, SCOTUS, Civil Rights, and everything that is near and dear to our hearts.
It was all about them and stomping their little clueless feet.
Thank you, KMOD~ Our job is GOTV!
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
139 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why don't we wait and see who wins the primaries, before demanding the loyalty pledge?
djean111
Jul 2015
#1
The whole point of loyalty pledges is coercing people into doing something they
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#2
And instead of answering my question, you opt for another round of browbeating.
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#28
I have a problem with people regurgitating the same lectures over and over again,
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#54
If you have to demand of people why they're here, you don't "get it".
winter is coming
Jul 2015
#137
AGREE ... Should she win the nomination, and some still can't get behind it, THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE
trueblue2007
Jul 2015
#52
Oh, then I must have missed the gushing over the qualifications of those other guys.
djean111
Jul 2015
#16
As the OP said, or hinted, or implied...what option is there regardless of who wins our primaries?
George II
Jul 2015
#27
As I don't agree with your gushing assessment of the current frontrunner
whatchamacallit
Jul 2015
#3
Agreed. We will go down as fools if we allow the GOP the WH, SCOTUS, etc.(VIDEO)
freshwest
Jul 2015
#41
"I wouldn't want to be around to explain to my grandchildren that their world is so screwed up
Cha
Jul 2015
#61
"I see no insults or disruptive content about the post. I don't have to agree with the content of
Cha
Jul 2015
#67
I will not vote against the Democratic presidential nominee in the 2016 presidential election
tularetom
Jul 2015
#34
Thank you sir. Your finger-waggling done did me good. Can't wait for tomorrow's scolding.
Scootaloo
Jul 2015
#55
When you're devoted to a theology that money is all that matters, it's what happens.
Scootaloo
Jul 2015
#92
"This is not a freaking game. The White House, the Supreme Court, and our civil rights are at stake"
Cha
Jul 2015
#80
Why only two choices? A country with over 300 million people has only two choices!
akbacchus_BC
Jul 2015
#94
Wasserman-Schultz is not letting anyone but Third Wayer types get past local.
djean111
Jul 2015
#129