Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 26 Democratic primary debates in 2008. Ask yourself why so few now. [View all]okasha
(11,573 posts)46. Six is probably at least 2 more than anyone will watch.
If Hillary performs in the first couple like she did at the Iowa dinner, it won't be her supporters who'll be calling for a halt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not for our benefit, that's for damned sure. They're protecting Hillary.
winter is coming
Aug 2015
#1
And people forget that our debates don't only reach Democratic primary voters...
cyberswede
Aug 2015
#3
If it makes you feel better, I wouldn't lob a joke at Bernie Sanders either...
brooklynite
Aug 2015
#22
So the purpose then, is to strictly limit the candidates interaction with one another?
bunnies
Aug 2015
#18
That might be an argument for only sanctioning 6 debates. It's not an argument
winter is coming
Aug 2015
#33
Someone should put you in charge of stopping any possible second threads on a simular topic...
L0oniX
Aug 2015
#50