HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Uh oh, the Pollster.com t... » Reply #35

Response to stevenleser (Reply #14)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 03:27 PM

35. So you support the Rovian candidate, eh? The liar? I quote you below (emphasis mine)

Hillary Clinton's Released White House Records show she Lied about Opposing NAFTA

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_steven_l_080320_hillary_clinton_s_re.htm

In fact, the documents released today show a meeting that Hillary chaired at the White House on November 10, 1993 where she promoted the passage of NAFTA to 120 people. Reports are coming out in every news agency pointing out the contradictions between her stated positions since announcing her bid for the Presidency and everything before that.

One of the things you would expect of someone who really has good experience and judgment is that they can articulate a basic set of principles and positions on issues that they can run on and defend and that stay relatively static. I'm not saying you have to stick to them in the face of overwhelming evidence that one of your positions has been proven to be wrong, like George W. Bush does, even someone who has good experience and judgment occasionally changes their mind. That is not what we have with Hillary. Hillary gives a different opinion on the same subjects every couple of weeks depending on her audience and what she thinks it will net her. As evidence of this is now coming out and is going to be presented to the American people in the starkest terms, how can one be expected to trust her to do anything that she says she is going to do? How can one really know what she believes or intends to do about anything? The only things Hillary's experience seems to be good for is perfecting how to talk out of both sides of her mouth, engaging in the politics of personal destruction and other aspects of her ruthless pursuit of power that remind one of what a Karl Rove might do. That kind of person ought not to be the Democratic nominee.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 59 replies Author Time Post
Godhumor Oct 2015 OP
ram2008 Oct 2015 #1
jkbRN Oct 2015 #3
magical thyme Oct 2015 #4
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #6
ram2008 Oct 2015 #7
stevenleser Oct 2015 #14
ram2008 Oct 2015 #16
stevenleser Oct 2015 #17
ram2008 Oct 2015 #18
stevenleser Oct 2015 #19
ram2008 Oct 2015 #20
stevenleser Oct 2015 #21
ram2008 Oct 2015 #23
stevenleser Oct 2015 #25
Armstead Oct 2015 #46
Fawke Em Oct 2015 #56
jeff47 Oct 2015 #52
Hissyspit Oct 2015 #26
stevenleser Oct 2015 #29
Hissyspit Oct 2015 #30
stevenleser Oct 2015 #33
frylock Oct 2015 #27
bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #31
stevenleser Oct 2015 #32
LineLineLineLineLineReply So you support the Rovian candidate, eh? The liar? I quote you below (emphasis mine)
Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #35
stevenleser Oct 2015 #38
Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #39
stevenleser Oct 2015 #40
Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #41
sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #58
sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #57
Time_Lord Oct 2015 #59
workinclasszero Oct 2015 #9
closeupready Oct 2015 #11
ish of the hammer Oct 2015 #15
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #43
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #44
ish of the hammer Oct 2015 #47
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #48
ish of the hammer Oct 2015 #49
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #50
hack89 Oct 2015 #10
zappaman Oct 2015 #37
DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #51
jeff47 Oct 2015 #53
Iliyah Oct 2015 #2
reformist2 Oct 2015 #5
upaloopa Oct 2015 #54
BooScout Oct 2015 #8
Buns_of_Fire Oct 2015 #12
Godhumor Oct 2015 #13
stevenleser Oct 2015 #34
Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2015 #42
99Forever Oct 2015 #22
Aerows Oct 2015 #24
oasis Oct 2015 #28
kenn3d Oct 2015 #36
DCBob Oct 2015 #45
kenn3d Oct 2015 #55
Please login to view edit histories.