Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oasis

(53,737 posts)
15. Simply put, in 2004 Democrats blamed Bush/Cheney for the war.
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 01:19 AM
Oct 2015

At least the ones with their heads screwed on correctly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HILLARY DID IT!! /sarcasm <--- cause this is needed around here uponit7771 Oct 2015 #1
In 2004 we didn't yet know the full damage from the Iraq War. Now we know. Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #2
You could say the same thing about the Clinton. Raine1967 Oct 2015 #3
She should have know better though because as a Senator it's your job to know stuff Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #5
Kerry was a senator. Should he have known better? Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #9
Yeah he should have known better. Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #10
So in 2004 and earlier supporting the Iraq war was excusable? (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #6
Certainly not for a US Senator. But for voters it probably seemed like we were "winning" the war. Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #7
But in 2002, Clinton's crystal ball showed her the full damage? McCamy Taylor Oct 2015 #21
No she just as very shitty judgement. Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #22
Sanders' crystal ball showed him the invasion would de-stabilize the entire Middle East. merrily Oct 2015 #26
oh, ffs bigtree Oct 2015 #35
If you got a better answer I guess you could speak your mind Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #36
Losing in Iowa equals crashing and burning now? Seems like only a very short time merrily Oct 2015 #4
I would consider third place in Iowa to be crashing and burning (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #8
As in Obama, Edwards, Clinton? merrily Oct 2015 #12
well played, merrily. :) nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #14
because people didn't think Kerry supported the war or would have went to war himself JI7 Oct 2015 #11
I disagree, his campaign was still viable That Guy 888 Oct 2015 #13
I agree--and I was both relatively uninformed then and set on voting for Kerry. merrily Oct 2015 #27
+1 And the DNC wanted him out so they simply snickered and let it play out Live and Learn Oct 2015 #34
Simply put, in 2004 Democrats blamed Bush/Cheney for the war. oasis Oct 2015 #15
What is your point here? Ken Burch Oct 2015 #16
My take... Drunken Irishman Oct 2015 #17
Good analysis, and this WAS significant, lasted for a while: elleng Oct 2015 #18
I'll also throw out there that the Gore endorsement hurt Dean... Drunken Irishman Oct 2015 #19
Because it's only bad if Clinton does it, silly. McCamy Taylor Oct 2015 #20
Who else who is running for the Democratic nomination NOW voted for the invasion (AND advocated for merrily Oct 2015 #29
Because voters thought that killing a lot of people was OK. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #23
The General Public and even of Democrats treestar Oct 2015 #24
2004 was to early to know what a disaster that vote was.... Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #25
Actually, Sanders and others knew what a disaster that vote was before the vote was taken. merrily Oct 2015 #30
Could be the same reason Terry McAuliffe INdemo Oct 2015 #28
The entire DLC/New Democrat contingent was against Dean. merrily Oct 2015 #31
Bush was running on national security and no one could picture Howard as C-in-C BeyondGeography Oct 2015 #32
Clue #1: Zorra Oct 2015 #33
Who cares? 99Forever Oct 2015 #37
The "Dean Scream" (that wasn't really a scream) was on an endless loop, on every network for weeks in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why did Howard Dean lose ...»Reply #15