2016 Postmortem

wyldwolf

(43,891 posts)

34. That's because it doesn't deserve a rebuttal

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #29)

Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:08 PM

Nov 2015

You may as well post something from a Republican site. It has no relevance to Democrats

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] guillaumeb Nov 2015 OP

Number 6 - HRC shot JKF. nt hack89 Nov 2015 #1

She was Turbineguy Nov 2015 #2

Look damnit she was too young, she ordered the hit from her pink Barbi Illuminati phone. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #77

I don't like this HassleCat Nov 2015 #3

Jesus Christ on a pogo stick giftedgirl77 Nov 2015 #4

7) She killed Vince Foster ... JoePhilly Nov 2015 #5

So far no replies or rebuttals to the actual substance. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #6

what actual substance? wyldwolf Nov 2015 #9

You have defined avoidance quite well. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #13

All I see is a left wing site making accusations wyldwolf Nov 2015 #16

And I see no rebuttal or discussion of the substance. eom guillaumeb Nov 2015 #29

That's because it doesn't deserve a rebuttal wyldwolf Nov 2015 #34

Are you saying that fact has no relevance? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #40

what facts? wyldwolf Nov 2015 #44

The facts alluded to in the article. eom guillaumeb Nov 2015 #47

alluded to? LOL wyldwolf Nov 2015 #49

Some things only deserve ridicule. To take the post (or source) seriously would serve only to NurseJackie Nov 2015 #10

Have you ever read: guillaumeb Nov 2015 #14

I'll bet it survives an alert handily Hekate Nov 2015 #56

There rarely is. They lack in substance what they try to make up with snide. leveymg Nov 2015 #17

Certain topics make people uncomfortable. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #22

Discomfort is the body's way of warning you something is wrong. leveymg Nov 2015 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author Aerows Nov 2015 #59

Perhaps a second reading is in order. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #67

She's the principal U.S. author of the Libya-Syria serial regime change operations. leveymg Nov 2015 #7

None of those accusations are define under US Law as crimes. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #8

Interference in the sovereignty of another country is against International Law. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #15

Pursuing US policy set hy the Prestdent as hus Secretary of State is not a crime. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #19

No government official can ignore International Law. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #25

Foreign governments do not consider her actions as a diplomat a crime. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #33

What foreign governments consider actionable does not change what is legal. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #37

None of what you suggested are illegal. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #45

Yours is an interesting view of International Law and US responsibilities. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #48

Winners make the rules... vorgan24 Nov 2015 #36

Some might say that Germany is winning (with the EU) what it lost during guillaumeb Nov 2015 #41

Easy come, easy go Demeter Nov 2015 #64

Very true. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #66

Europe will be leveled in this generation...there won't be anything to dilute Demeter Nov 2015 #70

By "leveled" do you mean integrated into a single state? eom guillaumeb Nov 2015 #72

No, I mean leveled, like Dresden in WWII Demeter Nov 2015 #73

One hopes that the world will never see such horror again. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #74

I have no such hopes Demeter Nov 2015 #82

Lets see... JaneyVee Nov 2015 #11

True. And that excuses what exactly? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #18

Has funded every war? zalinda Nov 2015 #27

Crimes? mcar Nov 2015 #12

This is not a court, it is a forum for discussion. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #20

I am aware that this is not a court mcar Nov 2015 #23

Therefore making the author guilty of hyperbole? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #26

#9 She killed Jimmy Hoffa and buried him in her back yard too. moobu2 Nov 2015 #21

Congrats BSers. You have dragged this forum down workinclasszero Nov 2015 #24

I agree with one and seven. Obviously. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #28

Take up your complaint about the jury system bvf Nov 2015 #58

as if the jury system actually works dlwickham Nov 2015 #76

Citing a Socialist web site??? MohRokTah Nov 2015 #30

So the source discredits the allegation? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #38

Yes, the source completely discredits the allegation. eom MohRokTah Nov 2015 #43

A new DU low! zappaman Nov 2015 #31

well said- sadly it has come to that redstateblues Nov 2015 #81

When a Republican does it silenttigersong Nov 2015 #35

I would agree with your view. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #39

If, as you say halfway down, they're " "alleged" crimes", your subject line is a lie. George II Nov 2015 #42

The alleged part is my editorial addition. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #46

Fiction vs. fact. It's a hit piece. George II Nov 2015 #50

I will await your point by point refutation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2015 #51

People suck: they support those horrible activities when their side is doing it cpwm17 Nov 2015 #52

One interpretation. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #68

I am a Sanders supporter Samantha Nov 2015 #53

A socialist troll parroting Free Republic talking points? Tarc Nov 2015 #54

You know there is a Socialist Group on the DU? Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #55

The horror!!!!!!! Socialists you say? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #75

Yes indeedy that is the case. Only has 4 Recs, though. So far. Hekate Nov 2015 #57

You must not know what Freerepublic is, Tarc. Scootaloo Nov 2015 #60

+all. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #61

Lol Tarc Nov 2015 #62

Excellent ad hom. Scootaloo Nov 2015 #63

Wow Dem2 Nov 2015 #65

How do you define conservative? guillaumeb Nov 2015 #69

As of 7.08 Central time, I have read the many negative responses to the post. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #71

That's some obnoxiousdrunk Nov 2015 #78

Are you now or have you ever been Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2015 #79

I am not now, not have I ever been a member of the guillaumeb Nov 2015 #80

Nice try Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2015 #83

When you offer some substantive criticism of the specific guillaumeb Nov 2015 #84