Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why is Clinton and her supporters trying to "Swift Boat" Bernie Sanders? [View all]ieoeja
(9,748 posts)93. So she had most of them, but not before HE had most of them?
No. Obama did not have most of them before she had most of them. She had most of them "before the primary". Just like she does now.
But hundreds of them "did" switch after Obama won the primary. Then Obama got most of them. After he won the primary, not before. She had them before.
And if Bernie wins the primary, hundreds of them will switch to him. They did it in 2008. They would do the same thing in 2016 "if" someone else wins.
This isn't even something you should be arguing. Even if we pretend this did not happen in 2008, it flies in the face of common sense. Of course, they will switch to the winner. For the same reason they did it in 2008. Ignoring the primary results would kill Democrats.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is Clinton and her supporters trying to "Swift Boat" Bernie Sanders? [View all]
ThePhilosopher04
Nov 2015
OP
I like a spirited discussion of the issues, but much of this is uncalled for.
olegramps
Nov 2015
#106
why would someone with a 92% chance of winning make their supporters "desperate"?
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2015
#7
"ALL factors"? Care to link your source? I highly doubt they've covered all factors.
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#96
The OP contains a completely empty claim. Literally. There is nothing there. n/t
pnwmom
Nov 2015
#86
Aside from the fact that it is DESPICABLE they are trying to do it because they KNOW
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#10
Catching a candidate in a lie or several lies is fair game. That is not what the OP refers to.
merrily
Nov 2015
#77
It's how they roll... IMO a preview of what we can expect from overlord hillary in the oval office
bowens43
Nov 2015
#49
A wonderful hit and run OP with no context. Gee, it couldn't be just to stir up shit could it?
still_one
Nov 2015
#55
Evidence? I know that people are supposed to have nothing but unquestioning worship.
Renew Deal
Nov 2015
#56
Strange, I only see Sanders supporters posting Right-wing memes and sources.
Metric System
Nov 2015
#59
HOW? I've seen this accusation twice here this afternoon, totally devoid of "details" or facts.
George II
Nov 2015
#69
Between this and the sudden influx of 2015 is 2007 posts, it has been a pretty weird day on DU
Godhumor
Nov 2015
#72
They are afraid that he is likely to win the nomination and they can't think of any other way to try
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#70
I think they see how weak her campaign is, how soft the support, and how strong the support for
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#117
basically you have people posting outrageous/inflammatory shit for yuks
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2015
#128