Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. Actually, she just said she will not be more aggressive than Obama. So, you're fearful of change in
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 09:42 PM
Nov 2015

what we did in Libya? Drones?

What about the war on drugs? I don't follow this closely, but my understanding, without googling, is that even medical marijuana is still not legal, even in states that wish to make it legal. No change desired there?

What about immigration? You liked everything Obama did with that?

https://www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention

Change? HassleCat Nov 2015 #1
A socialist afraid of change from the administration of a New Democrat? Interesting! merrily Nov 2015 #2
Foreign policy would be one example HassleCat Nov 2015 #6
Actually, she just said she will not be more aggressive than Obama. So, you're fearful of change in merrily Nov 2015 #9
I can see more change with Clinton than Sanders. Clinton is getting lots of endorsements from Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #3
If you think Republicans, who control both Houses, will work with Hillary better than they will work merrily Nov 2015 #10
Did I say anything about the Republicans? It just might be possible the Republican congressional Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #15
she will never have the chance to prove it , if nominated bowens43 Nov 2015 #4
'Her party’s primary voters expect Mrs. Clinton to be their eventual nominee by more than a 4-to-1.. riversedge Nov 2015 #7
Her party’s primary voters expect Mrs. Clinton to be their eventual nominee by more than a 4-to-1. frylock Nov 2015 #12
I bet. She and the Republicans will dole out shit sandwiches so fast it'll make your head spin. Scuba Nov 2015 #5
No question about it by the polling and endorsements she's receiving FloridaBlues Nov 2015 #8
Just like this time 2008! Fun fact: Kerry was barely a blip on the screen one month before Iowa. merrily Nov 2015 #11
That's because most people don't know that Bernie has a good record of actually getting things done jfern Nov 2015 #13
Are you talking about a lot of things actually done as in three bills he sponsored getting passed in Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #17
He's gotten a lot more done than that jfern Nov 2015 #18
Then he needs to find a way to rewrite the voting and sponsor record of Congress. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #20
That doesn't even count companion bills, let alone amendments jfern Nov 2015 #22
I gave his record, tell the record keepers they are wrong. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #25
Hillary doesn't have any accomplishments either under that metric jfern Nov 2015 #27
Had the same in 8 years, ratio was much better. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #28
It's a lot harder to get a bill signed into law as a Representative jfern Nov 2015 #29
They know she is a much harder worker with a much greater scope of influence LuvLoogie Nov 2015 #14
Effective At What ??? - Greasing The Skids For The 1% ??? WillyT Nov 2015 #16
No, actually helping citizens of the US. The 1% do not need her help. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #19
This is one of the most outlandish notions Trajan Nov 2015 #21
I don't want her to be effective Doctor_J Nov 2015 #23
Huummmm, yes you are right, she has voted less times for military action than Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #30
Good news. Thank you for posting K&R nt. Persondem Nov 2015 #24
Like Bill was so effective when he reformed welfare for the jwirr Nov 2015 #26
Bill Clinton did not repeal Glass Stegall, he signed a veto proof bill. Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Poll Shows Hillary Clinto...»Reply #9