Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:26 AM Nov 2015

O'Malley Slams Clinton's 'SHAMEFUL' Comment on 9/11 and Wall Street Ties [View all]


“...I believe that we should not be on the hook as taxpayers for the bad bets that are made by banks that have grown too big to manage on Wall Street,” he said. “And in that shameful moment I think Secretary Clinton was trying to pump out a smokescreen to cover her tracks on this one....”





Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley on Monday slammed Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton for her “shameful” response linking 9/11 to her Wall Street donations. In Saturday’s second Democratic debate, the former senator reminded viewers that she represented New York during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and said much of the support Wall Street has given her stems from that event. “We were attacked in downtown Manhattan, where Wall Street is,” Clinton said. “I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild. That was good for New York, it was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country.”



Speaking on CNN’s “New Day,” O’Malley blasted Clinton for what he said was an inappropriate response. “I thought that moment, frankly, was pretty shameful. I don’t believe that the people watching were applauding the notion that Secretary Clinton was pumping out this smokescreen and wrapping herself in the tragedy of 9/11,” he said. “I don’t think they saw that as something appropriate to do, to mask her coziness and her closeness to Wall Street and all of the architects of the crash of 2008.” O’Malley cited their contrasting stances on Wall Street as a fundamental distinction between the two candidates. While Clinton “subscribes to a sort of crony capitalism” that benefits the big banks, he said, he believes in “traditional fair-market American capitalism.”


cont

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/hillary-clinton-9-11-wall-street-martin-omalley-215923
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
good for O'Malley! He needs to keep hammering it. nt antigop Nov 2015 #1
A day late, a dollar short. MADem Nov 2015 #2
Truth is truth... Segami Nov 2015 #4
Of course; nothing wrong with him expressing his opinions. MADem Nov 2015 #5
Keep repeating it. Do you do it in your dreams???? elleng Nov 2015 #8
What a weird thing to say. Now it's a crime to discuss politics on a political discussion board? MADem Nov 2015 #9
'Crime?' THAT's a good one. elleng Nov 2015 #11
I was wrong about something. Admiral Loinpresser Nov 2015 #22
THANKS, Admiral; elleng Nov 2015 #23
I think that he and Bernie together might make a difference in caucus states though... cascadiance Nov 2015 #6
I'll Second That Duckfan Nov 2015 #19
He's my second choice and I think the only reason he isn't resonating, is because sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #15
OT Hepburn Nov 2015 #3
Bless him. Point out the eternal shame of those inappropriate words. eom Betty Karlson Nov 2015 #7
He's been watching Trump too long MaggieD Nov 2015 #10
You tell'em M'Om! and agree on the jeans comment above, lol! magical thyme Nov 2015 #12
Good for him. He's right that was shameful. askew Nov 2015 #13
Go O'Malley! SoapBox Nov 2015 #14
K&R hedgehog Nov 2015 #16
He'd make a great VP for Bernie Demeter Nov 2015 #17
I thought O'Malley zentrum Nov 2015 #18
Props to O'M for that! d_legendary1 Nov 2015 #20
Good for him. Those are bold comments Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»O'Malley Slams Clinton's ...»Reply #0