Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hey SEIU management: you are traitors, will be mocked in history books [View all]SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)103. I suggest you do the same. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hey SEIU management: you are traitors, will be mocked in history books [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Nov 2015
OP
LOL. Getting hard to tell the satire apart from the non-satirical conspiracy theories.
DanTex
Nov 2015
#1
Of course they do. Plutocrats have made it so few others have the money to pay anyone.
merrily
Nov 2015
#13
Something like the reason such a small percentage of eligible voters make it to the polls election
merrily
Nov 2015
#8
Maybe SEIU's goal was actually get a Union supporter elected? Not just "send a message"?
brooklynite
Nov 2015
#5
Amazing the number of folks here who want to blame Iraq on Hillary rather than George Bush.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#57
So basically, you're going to ignore it and pretend it doesn't matter because... made up stuff?
Kentonio
Nov 2015
#47
Most GOOD unions support candidates that reject so-called "guest labor" programs...
cascadiance
Nov 2015
#15
I was represented by unions twice in my life, both times in a minority group...
HereSince1628
Nov 2015
#131
Union members are better than union leadership and unions are better than no unions, always,
merrily
Nov 2015
#132
I hope you're wrong, too. What union would give up $3 an hour on behalf of its members--and that's
merrily
Nov 2015
#39
"... three national member polls from the fall of 2014 through the fall of 2015..." nt
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#45
what an odd thing to demand from someone who has told you they don't have access to those polls.
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#86
what does that have to do with your attempt at labelling a DU'er?...ask the pollsters. nt
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#100
Still: end of June. Why take a poll before anyone, including Hillary, announced?
merrily
Nov 2015
#126
Yeah! They should have gone against the wishes of the VAST majority of their members.
Amimnoch
Nov 2015
#32
"... three national member polls from the fall of 2014 through the fall of 2015..." nt
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#46
I take the member's word over the union's story. The member has no reason to dissemble.
merrily
Nov 2015
#64
That poster cannot know if other union members were polled in the fall of 2015. nt
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#67
There IS an established pattern of union leaders defying the wishes of the rank and file
Maedhros
Nov 2015
#120
See Replies 33 and 34 and then tell us again how democracy is supposed to work,
merrily
Nov 2015
#44
I can say the same thing but it's rather childish to do so since many Union members support Bernie.
Autumn
Nov 2015
#104
Who knows but Raygun crushed them. Fired them all and banned them for life from ever working
fasttense
Nov 2015
#82
Rarely has an OP looked like it really should contain the words "kulaks" and "counterrevolutionaries
NuclearDem
Nov 2015
#77
It is very transparent to me. This union leaders offered no polling and did not support the
DhhD
Nov 2015
#93
Are you a Union member? I am, have been long enough to remember the Teamsters endorsing
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2015
#146
Teamsters Union endorsed the Union busting Reagan, which is why this Union member takes
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2015
#147
I think I read 75% of membership supported her. Most of other 25% will too within a few years.
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#127
So why would union leadership sell out to the big money oligarchy? They want a cut of the
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#141