Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
37. 4%, not 25%
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 06:47 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Sat Nov 28, 2015, 09:05 PM - Edit history (1)

The difference between the premiums private insurance takes in and the payments they give to providers is 4% of our national healthcare spending. It's irritating but not the problem; the 60% that physicians and hospitals take is the problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks for posting this, elleng Samantha Nov 2015 #1
Thanks, Sam, elleng Nov 2015 #2
And it still includes insurance firms profit for providing no real service daybranch Nov 2015 #3
Maybe you missed this part Andy823 Nov 2015 #6
Please address the point made kristopher Nov 2015 #29
doesn't medicare get funded hill2016 Nov 2015 #39
K&R!!! This is excellent! Nt riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #4
It has merit....though I don't think "industry support" should be the goal Armstead Nov 2015 #5
did you read the part where unitedhealth hill2016 Nov 2015 #12
Frankly, that is the point Armstead Nov 2015 #21
Thank you. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #27
Yes. ACA has been in place for such a short time, and rising rates are already squeezing GoneFishin Nov 2015 #33
the reason rates are rising is hill2016 Nov 2015 #40
Great argument MFrohike Nov 2015 #36
Thanks elleng Andy823 Nov 2015 #7
Single payer includes negotiating hospital, provider and drug prices. Problem solved n/t eridani Nov 2015 #8
nope hill2016 Nov 2015 #13
If you'd read any of the actual single payer bills on offer, you'd know that price negotiation-- eridani Nov 2015 #18
Existing "single payer" systems don't allow health care profiteers to run roughshod over consumers. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #28
Kick to the top Andy823 Nov 2015 #9
A stop gap solution - but we still need to working for single payer Matariki Nov 2015 #10
Excellent Post, EllenG! Aerows Nov 2015 #11
It is about protecting the status quo because doing so makes certain people rich. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #17
my only question hill2016 Nov 2015 #14
“Governor, you’re breaking the rules.” Crystalite Nov 2015 #15
Thanks and you're welcome, Crystalite. elleng Nov 2015 #19
As a physician I can say this is an interesting idea. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #16
Insurance companies...meh. Still, I would love to see Sanders and O'Malley actually just discuss Live and Learn Nov 2015 #20
This sounds more like price controls and rationing than rational. Also looks like a libertarian idea Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #22
kick to the top. nt Andy823 Nov 2015 #23
Kick nt Andy823 Nov 2015 #24
k&r bigtree Nov 2015 #25
To me, insurance companies add zero value to the vast majority of Americans Jarqui Nov 2015 #26
+100%! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #30
4%, not 25% Recursion Nov 2015 #37
there is a lot of administrative costs that would disappear hill2016 Nov 2015 #41
Really? Jarqui Nov 2015 #42
you said hill2016 Nov 2015 #44
From the study referenced Jarqui Nov 2015 #45
The 4% is straight from CMS; it's hard to argue with Recursion Nov 2015 #48
I've been talking about the trillion dollars private insurance handles and %s related to that Jarqui Nov 2015 #50
Well, actually, you were talking about the percent of all healthcare spending, until you saw Recursion Nov 2015 #51
Those are not my accurate positions you are responding to. Jarqui Nov 2015 #52
They spend less because *they regulate costs* Recursion Nov 2015 #53
Nope, I disagree. Not accurate. Jarqui Nov 2015 #54
actually hill2016 Nov 2015 #43
The potential "administrative savings" is unfortunately another unicorn, I think. Recursion Nov 2015 #49
From the article above House of Roberts Nov 2015 #31
As long as you have significant parties involved in the process (like private insurers) Jarqui Nov 2015 #46
Really interesting. Thanks ellen, for posting! n/t ms liberty Nov 2015 #32
You're welcome, ms liberty. elleng Nov 2015 #34
kick bigtree Nov 2015 #35
Health insurance should be a public utility. Private insurers are bloodsucking leeches. Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #38
you do know that hill2016 Nov 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Best Health Care Fix ...»Reply #37