2016 Postmortem

randys1

(16,286 posts)

243. I ignore the stalking you do with me, but I do think you should stop stalking me

Reply to 840high (Reply #215)

Wed Dec 2, 2015, 12:27 PM

Dec 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

296 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton pastes Rosa Parks into campaign logo, Twitter users disgusted [View all] Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 OP

oh geez hillary wtf nt retrowire Dec 2015 #1

OMG!!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #2

AFrican Americans may be bothered by this, most white people alleged to be randys1 Dec 2015 #3

White people aren't allowed to genuinely think it's crass? arcane1 Dec 2015 #4

Depends on their motive, their attitude about HIllary. randys1 Dec 2015 #5

I think she needs to have someone in the ad department with a little common LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #13

so what you are saying is....the Hillary patrol gets to decide which of Team Hillary's errors..... virtualobserver Dec 2015 #53

As always, they get to choose what we are LuvNewcastle Dec 2015 #109

then they can't criticize bernie for anything without a note. right? And if you're roguevalley Dec 2015 #126

"There is nothing wrong with your television. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. PatrickforO Dec 2015 #228

Are you also suggesting that floriduck Dec 2015 #148

"Depends on their motive" NAILED IT Number23 Dec 2015 #172

Look at the OUTRAGE directed at me for saying something that you and I both know is randys1 Dec 2015 #231

Only if they agree that posting FDR pictures with Bernie is crass. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #289

I didn't realize Bernie posted pictures of himself with FDR n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #293

Why do you say that?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #7

You know what I am saying. I am saying Hillary is bashed HUNDREDS OF TIMES A DAY randys1 Dec 2015 #11

Doubling down now??You didn't say "some " in your post, did you?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #15

You think some people on DU don't give a shit about Rosa Parks? CBGLuthier Dec 2015 #178

...^ that 840high Dec 2015 #196

I dont just believe it, I know it. Some, not all. randys1 Dec 2015 #230

So for legit complaints about Hillary you want bernie fans to shut up??? LOL, OK. NT Logical Dec 2015 #241

So is Sanders AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #258

Exactly. Good thing this OP mostly sources AAs, so the OP is just reporting what their opinions are. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #16

I don't need anyone's permission ibegurpard Dec 2015 #61

Or someone. n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #79

You just KNOW how it would go down on DU if Sanders did this. delrem Dec 2015 #80

But you see, Bernie doesn't have to do this Proserpina Dec 2015 #227

Sorry, beltanefauve Dec 2015 #129

Hey Randy... Many Of Us Recognize The Possibility That We May Be Stuck Voting For Hillary... WillyT Dec 2015 #173

I have a feeling you wouldn't 840high Dec 2015 #215

I ignore the stalking you do with me, but I do think you should stop stalking me randys1 Dec 2015 #243

Alert it or quit whining! Wow, you are paranoid! Nt Logical Dec 2015 #247

I dont play the alert game...if you only knew how revealing this comment is randys1 Dec 2015 #252

I dont really understand most of what you say! nt Logical Dec 2015 #255

Bollocks. Bollocks, bollocks, bollocks, bollocks, bollocks, bollocks, BOLLOCKS. sibelian Dec 2015 #225

LOL, so white people should not be outraged if blacks are unhappy? You might... Logical Dec 2015 #240

And yet the AfAm community here at DU Agrees with me, how weird is that randys1 Dec 2015 #242

So next time a cop shoots a black man you just keep your mouth shut! Lol, you are a jewell! Nt Logical Dec 2015 #246

Sorry, but I am not a hypocrite on any of these issues. I dont attack Hillary randys1 Dec 2015 #248

You are seriously comedy relief daily! Nt Logical Dec 2015 #254

Then let them post and tell us!!!! jack_krass Dec 2015 #290

Who says black people are unhappy? And why is it fine for Bernie to connect pnwmom Dec 2015 #267

You aren't the thought police AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #251

Nor do I attack Hillary dozens of times a day, everyday for months, and then all of a sudden randys1 Dec 2015 #253

You aren't the thought police AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #257

Let me clarify what RANDYS1 is saying..... Logical Dec 2015 #256

To be fair, I doubt Hillary Clinton herself did this Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #6

I checked and its still there. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #9

I agree it should be removed. nt Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #14

Rosa Parks freed the world when she did what she did and she should roguevalley Dec 2015 #127

No, she wouldn't have any idea about, may not now. I can't think of very many LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #23

This guy took responsibility: bvar22 Dec 2015 #260

I think Lyndon Johnson was the last one to accept any responsibility for anything. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #261

I agree. bvar22 Dec 2015 #263

I guess to itemize it, it would be Carter the last D and Eisenhower the last R LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #264

Exactly. I'm artsy, I could see how a staffer with background in graphic art... Turn CO Blue Dec 2015 #43

That will be news to nobody. bvf Dec 2015 #122

tone. deaf. merrily Dec 2015 #8

Also tone deaf: "Hardhats for Hillary" Crystalite Dec 2015 #50

Exactly what I was going to say. +1000 nt Live and Learn Dec 2015 #137

Any photoshoppers here? Wilms Dec 2015 #10

Already been done. Google is your friend. nt Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #12

Wow! Wilms Dec 2015 #17

I really don't think it's funny Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #29

I really don't think it's funny for ANY politician to invoke 9/11 so cynically. Wilms Dec 2015 #34

since what 3000 people died and she uses it as an excuse to deflect roguevalley Dec 2015 #128

Why would you want that? JaneyVee Dec 2015 #21

AND she does it again! Wilms Dec 2015 #62

Yup, I just read that. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #69

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Dec 2015 #35

oh my AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #42

ha. brilliant. truly brilliant. nt artislife Dec 2015 #56

Oooh, good one. Since she LOOOOOOOVES invoking 9/11 so much! kath Dec 2015 #179

How M-F'ing disrespectful! Hepburn Dec 2015 #18

It's probably her staff who did it, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #20

It is so disrespectful to the memory and legacy of Rosa Parks Hepburn Dec 2015 #30

I completely agree. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #31

Inelegant execution, but wanting to honor Parks? 6chars Dec 2015 #113

Twitter thrives on eternal outrage. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #19

or disrespecting American icons. artislife Dec 2015 #58

Why is this different from Bernie's image being connected with MLK's? n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #268

Tirelessly, we will repeat. artislife Dec 2015 #279

Yeah, and Hillary's campaign came sooooo close to curing cancer with this Rosa Parks hybrid logo. cui bono Dec 2015 #143

How can you defend this? Shame on you. 840high Dec 2015 #197

wow Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #22

It's the logo on her official Twitter page darkangel218 Dec 2015 #27

4.7 m followers. how many from Iraq roguevalley Dec 2015 #130

65% at least. sleepyvoter Dec 2015 #150

I don't want to trash-talk this. Maybe it represents Rosa Parks sitting behind the driver. BlueJazz Dec 2015 #24

You're too kind, if Bernie did this, Team Hillary would spit fireballs demwing Dec 2015 #36

mmmkay... cui bono Dec 2015 #146

No class UglyGreed Dec 2015 #25

Omg Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #26

I am appalled at using this Civil Rights icon for pandering for support in a prez primary race. Hepburn Dec 2015 #32

Well, well, well. nc4bo Dec 2015 #28

Update. The MLK/Bernie lectures have been canceled because lol. AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #33

And the people that start those lecture threads are nowhere to be seen melman Dec 2015 #125

LOL! cui bono Dec 2015 #151

ROFL kath Dec 2015 #218

Perpetual outrage by twitter followers and Bernie supporters goes hand-in-hand taught_me_patience Dec 2015 #37

Fuck excuses demwing Dec 2015 #40

If youre not outraged, youre not paying attention. nt bunnies Dec 2015 #135

a campaign fueled by anger redstateblues Dec 2015 #155

A Buzzfeed "article" firebrand80 Dec 2015 #38

Logo is on her official Twitter page. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #39

So. What. firebrand80 Dec 2015 #44

You brought up Buzzfeed, like it has anything to do with it. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #45

What's the message?? firebrand80 Dec 2015 #49

Oh please , you gotta be kidding me now! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #51

Some Do Not Recognize That Newspapers Are Dying, And TV News Will Follow... "Buzzfeed ??? WillyT Dec 2015 #85

Ha roguevalley Dec 2015 #131

The message: is that that camp Clinton Turned Parks into a fucking cartoon riding the Harrow. bunnies Dec 2015 #132

Tomorrow, the claim will be that it never happened. delrem Dec 2015 #163

ANONYMOUS INTERNET IDS GET ANGRY ON INTERNET!!! onehandle Dec 2015 #41

I'm still trying to figure out firebrand80 Dec 2015 #46

Well, months ago you guys were busy telling us the arrow pointed forward.... jeff47 Dec 2015 #87

That debate was equally stupid nt firebrand80 Dec 2015 #96

Well, are you willing to accept that it's the "back" of the logo then? jeff47 Dec 2015 #99

Who. Cares. firebrand80 Dec 2015 #102

Well, "front versus back" was kinda an important thing with this woman..... (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #111

One now can interpret that Rosa Parks is going to the right. sleepyvoter Dec 2015 #153

... SidDithers Dec 2015 #259

Or how it's ok for Hillary to be bribed with Wall Street... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #154

When I saw it I thought it meant moving women forward. Wow. Did not see what others are claiming. Laser102 Dec 2015 #110

Do you not find the new logo absurd? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #48

I think we can all agree that's kinda sick. pa28 Dec 2015 #47

OK, that's pretty cheesy but its far from the most tasteless thing Clinton has ever done tularetom Dec 2015 #52

good point AtomicKitten Dec 2015 #67

Someone here said that there is nothing lower than using a "dead icon to millions of Autumn Dec 2015 #54

Yes, I do remember that. nc4bo Dec 2015 #76

You people are a trip. And I say that in all seriousness Number23 Dec 2015 #84

"I'd be embarrassed and ashamed as hell" to proudly have such a double standard Autumn Dec 2015 #93

I'm actually surprised you're so confused, considering your unending fascination with every single Number23 Dec 2015 #98

Now your confused, Bernie doesn't have a poster that I know of and if you think Autumn Dec 2015 #104

You can somehow remember VERBATIM words that I typed DAYS ago Number23 Dec 2015 #106

Wrong thread, there is no poster of Bernie in this thread. Autumn Dec 2015 #115

I wouldn't be flattered at all. Not even a little bit Number23 Dec 2015 #116

I understand what you said. Post #70. Your words. No poster of Bernie. Have a good evening. Autumn Dec 2015 #117

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #156

Did you see this? The double standard is fucking insane Autumn Dec 2015 #159

I saw that and now I saw the anti-Bernie w/Bernice OPs. cui bono Dec 2015 #165

I +1 your entire post. Number23 Dec 2015 #164

Please, elaborate. Show me all of it, I'd like to see it. cui bono Dec 2015 #166

What are you on about? No one said anything about Sanders. cui bono Dec 2015 #160

As usual, a day late and with nothing to add. Number23 Dec 2015 #162

That's quite an accusation. Back it up. Seriously, I'd like to see all of it. cui bono Dec 2015 #167

You are coming in here screaming and throwing spittle all over everyone with your DEMANDS that Number23 Dec 2015 #170

If you did state your opinion then great, I missed it. Sorry. cui bono Dec 2015 #202

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #206

Jury Results~ Cha Dec 2015 #205

SAME CRAP every single day. Fly into a thread to harass people, alert like crazy when they respond Number23 Dec 2015 #207

Sorry you got a BOGUS HIDE, 23.. posting results because the alerter's comment was not true.. Cha Dec 2015 #217

There's an ignore function. bvf Dec 2015 #277

"Harass Bernie supporters"? Isn't the whole point of the OP and this thread to harass..... George II Dec 2015 #223

No, not at all. The point is to have fun and maybe debate somewhat on a political chat board. Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #233

So now the point of criticizing Clinton is to "have fun". Very nice. George II Dec 2015 #236

Us people, we have no decency! No honor! Not anything! delrem Dec 2015 #169

That's the way to refute everything that I've said! You sure showed that you guys are doing the Number23 Dec 2015 #171

I wish I had a dart of FO4 "calmex" to shoot. delrem Dec 2015 #174

Sounds like you're awfully familiar with it. Probably not a bad thing. Hopefully your own foot Number23 Dec 2015 #175

OK, that's better! delrem Dec 2015 #176

No, we agreed that whatever calmex is, hopefully you're coordinated enough to be able to hit Number23 Dec 2015 #177

And I have no decency! No honor! No anything! delrem Dec 2015 #181

Hey, if you're looking for me to disagree with your subject heading Number23 Dec 2015 #183

I'm quoting you, Einstein. delrem Dec 2015 #184

LOL! Is that what you were trying to do??? Number23 Dec 2015 #185

You wailed. You continue to wail. delrem Dec 2015 #189

I'm not tired. I am laughing quite openly at you and your attempts to sound smart. Number23 Dec 2015 #190

What you lack in substance you make up for in fervor! delrem Dec 2015 #193

And you MOST DEFINITELY represent the Sanders supporter that the entire Internet has come to know Number23 Dec 2015 #194

Yes, on the internet we all make ourselves visible. delrem Dec 2015 #195

I wish I knew how to make your numerous "goodbyes" stick Number23 Dec 2015 #204

They're nowhere to be found now.....MIA! Segami Dec 2015 #139

And then there is this Autumn Dec 2015 #142

Two sets of rules of outrage..... Segami Dec 2015 #157

Their "messaging" is never heartfelt or authentic... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #158

they always telegraph their intentions MisterP Dec 2015 #168

Maybe that's because some Bernie Sanders supporters moobu2 Dec 2015 #191

. Autumn Dec 2015 #221

Some asked UglyGreed Dec 2015 #55

K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #57

She should have used this but the one she used was fine too. moobu2 Dec 2015 #59

No it was not fine ibegurpard Dec 2015 #64

here's the response that gets this exactly right ibegurpard Dec 2015 #60

All the Tweets I read were positive. moobu2 Dec 2015 #63

unsurprising ibegurpard Dec 2015 #65

It isn't tacky in the least bit moobu2 Dec 2015 #68

Tacky and childish. nc4bo Dec 2015 #78

I think the objection to it is phony moobu2 Dec 2015 #81

Whatev's. nt nc4bo Dec 2015 #83

Did you notice beltanefauve Dec 2015 #133

If Bernie did this, which he wouldn't- it's insulting and stupid- hill's peeps morningfog Dec 2015 #66

Hillary is honoring Rosa Parks moobu2 Dec 2015 #70

She is exploiting Rosa Parks. morningfog Dec 2015 #71

THIS!!!^^ darkangel218 Dec 2015 #72

Right. moobu2 Dec 2015 #74

By that definition, Bernie's been exploiting MLK. pnwmom Dec 2015 #269

Oh god! I did not see Bernie incorporate a cartoon version of MLK into his logo. morningfog Dec 2015 #270

I've seen Bernie campaign posters with MLK's image. So have you, I'm sure. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #271

Bernie Sanders campaign posters with MLK? I haven't seen any. morningfog Dec 2015 #272

Here. pnwmom Dec 2015 #274

You gave a good shot. You tried, but those are not morningfog Dec 2015 #275

from the linked tweets ibegurpard Dec 2015 #73

There are plenty of Tweets supporting her. moobu2 Dec 2015 #75

She's pandering and using. 840high Dec 2015 #200

No she wasn't. moobu2 Dec 2015 #201

And Clinton wasn't? 840high Dec 2015 #214

"You People"!!!!! Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #292

I don't like this. But I dislike the folks who were just fine and dandy with a Sanders poster with Number23 Dec 2015 #77

There are times when I feel that all candidates are guilty of pandering. nc4bo Dec 2015 #82

That's because they all DO pander. And it's INCREDIBLY obvious. We know it when we see it Number23 Dec 2015 #89

It's never going to change be it the Roosevelts, Kennedy, MLK, RP - whomever. nc4bo Dec 2015 #91

Using a musicians' money without permission is a FAR cry from using a deceased civil rights icon Number23 Dec 2015 #92

Hey - I never asked for an answer 23. nc4bo Dec 2015 #94

It's wrong whoever does it. Nothing gray about it to me. Number23 Dec 2015 #100

Yes n/t snpsmom Dec 2015 #123

That's my feeling as well rpannier Dec 2015 #88

Even beyond the look and feel of the logo, it's an incredibly bad idea Number23 Dec 2015 #90

I think there's a difference and this is actually worse Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #121

That was from some random person on the Internet. This is from her campaign. jfern Dec 2015 #97

It sucks whoever the fuck is doing it. Number23 Dec 2015 #101

Well, Bernie's campaign doesn't have control over the random people on the Internet jfern Dec 2015 #103

They do it because there are idiots who will APPLAUD it. Just like many did here Number23 Dec 2015 #105

But Sanders and his campaign didn't make the poster. No selective outrage in this case. cui bono Dec 2015 #203

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #208

Where did I say anything about black people? You keep trying to paint me as a racist but that's bull cui bono Dec 2015 #209

Because you are in a thread screaming that people weren't mad enough about BLM in a thread that Number23 Dec 2015 #210

That makes no sense. You brought up selective outrage. BLM is a prime example of that. cui bono Dec 2015 #211

Can someone please come to post #211 and explain to this person that Rosa Parks and Black Lives Number23 Dec 2015 #212

Who said they were? Your attempts to paint me as racist and now stupid are pathetic. cui bono Dec 2015 #213

Keeping track of the number of recs? bvf Dec 2015 #278

Lol bravenak Dec 2015 #280

Exactly my point. bvf Dec 2015 #281

I know. That's why it's funny. I love obtuseness. bravenak Dec 2015 #282

Strictly speaking, bvf Dec 2015 #283

And some PEOPLE are obtuse as well. bravenak Dec 2015 #284

LOL. No kidding. bvf Dec 2015 #286

I love the hillary fans thinking hillary is never wrong! Nt Logical Dec 2015 #244

What good for the gander is good for the goose. LiberalAndProud Dec 2015 #86

lol Babel_17 Dec 2015 #95

...say the people who've decided Che Guevara would wear a BERNIE t-shirt... brooklynite Dec 2015 #107

Which people are those? Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #108

Che isn't a beloved important civil rights icon from the USA. artislife Dec 2015 #134

If Che! is so unimportant here, why are people using his visage? brooklynite Dec 2015 #138

Read all the adjectives. artislife Dec 2015 #186

Oh I'm sorry.. ibegurpard Dec 2015 #180

Can you believe he is a transit planner? artislife Dec 2015 #187

yeah-- almost as funny as DU's dorm room dialectical materialists lining up to support a Centrist Warren DeMontague Dec 2015 #199

When did Hillary even protest anything?? cprise Dec 2015 #112

Hillary's very first job out of Yale Law was working for Marian Edelman pnwmom Dec 2015 #120

Again: When did she PROTEST? When was her *ss on the line? cprise Dec 2015 #216

What she did was an act of protest. She worked effectively against the system. pnwmom Dec 2015 #219

No. What Rosa Parks did was an act of protest. bvar22 Dec 2015 #262

Rosa Parks former attorney just introduced her at a gathering of civil rights attorneys pnwmom Dec 2015 #266

Because 9/11 bunnies Dec 2015 #114

Rosa OhDemMom Dec 2015 #118

If the Bernie Sander's campaign had done something like this, jalan48 Dec 2015 #119

The double standard is completely ridiculous jfern Dec 2015 #124

The swarm would have made sure of that. Segami Dec 2015 #141

Somebody really didn't think this through very well mythology Dec 2015 #136

"Hillary Clinton's logo accidentally puts Rosa Parks in the back of a bus" cui bono Dec 2015 #140

True, this would made all their past supposed outrage look like nothing jfern Dec 2015 #145

Of course they will. Just like they did over her treatment of BLM. cui bono Dec 2015 #147

Simplest explanation: Hillary can't relate to Black voters without this dehumanizing commoditization Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #144

Hillary, you are not Google! CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #149

She is reducing Rosa Parks to an ad image to support her brand. Bernblu Dec 2015 #152

Kick !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #161

It was to honor Rosa Parks on the 60th anniversary of the day that she refused to give up her seat. Beacool Dec 2015 #182

Honoring Rosa Parks by using a cartoon of her in a campaign logo? Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #192

I thought it was fabulous JustAnotherGen Dec 2015 #222

Yeah, me too. Beacool Dec 2015 #273

Hill's just tweaking her brand senz Dec 2015 #188

No, no, that's not disgusting. Warren DeMontague Dec 2015 #198

Hillary supporters are going to be furious with this - look how upset they were about Killer Mike Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #220

Hillary supporters: "BERNIE'S TONE DEAF ABOUT RACE! You should listen to black people!" sibelian Dec 2015 #224

Tone deaf and exploitative in the same package Proserpina Dec 2015 #226

Maybe you hit on something. They have too much money sloshing around looking for places to be spent Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #229

being of Rosa Parks generation heaven05 Dec 2015 #232

^^^+1,000^^^ N/T Hepburn Dec 2015 #234

I just googled "Hillary Twitter Rosa Parks" ismnotwasm Dec 2015 #235

That's not what I got: Hepburn Dec 2015 #237

Google search results are often gamed Babel_17 Dec 2015 #238

So where is the support for the allegation that the tweets are coming from RW sources? Hepburn Dec 2015 #239

I though the issue is the implication that if we give this story any attention ... Babel_17 Dec 2015 #245

Maybe I misunderstood the post... Hepburn Dec 2015 #250

That's "images" ismnotwasm Dec 2015 #249

I think the woman looks like she's the driver of that vehicle. pnwmom Dec 2015 #276

Of course they would jump on this UglyGreed Dec 2015 #265

Twitter users ... nsd Dec 2015 #285

Somehow that is correct Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #288

I'm not feeling it MrScorpio Dec 2015 #287

twitter 'ppl' are always 'disgusted' with something or other Sunlei Dec 2015 #291

New Hillary add:"Voting for me should be easy..." demwing Dec 2015 #294

That's right, always picking apart a couple of words. Like Life is a serious 42 word game. Sunlei Dec 2015 #295

your joy demwing Dec 2015 #296