2016 Postmortem

Cal33

(7,018 posts)

37. Here's the prediction from Western Illinois Univ. Presidential Prediction polls for 2016. They

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 11:28 AM

Dec 2015

began their predictions in 1975 (that's 40 years!!), and have been correct every single time so
far. They predicted 49% for Sanders, and 38% for Bush. They even predicted O'Malley as
Sanders' V-P. Until now, their accuracy rate has been 100%.

http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/Western-Illinois-University-Predicts-Bernie-Sanders-Victory-in-2016-346130992.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clintons 3 dimensional campaign is hurting her badly [View all] retrowire Dec 2015 OP

Obviously not leftofcool Dec 2015 #1

Polls Polls Polls!!! coyote Dec 2015 #5

NO! I have a tremendous lot more of enthusiasm for having brussel sprouts 1monster Dec 2015 #10

The vast majority of Democrats disagree with you. MoonRiver Dec 2015 #33

60-30 in the primary and beats every Republican. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #25

Doesn't seem to be hurting her with the 20 M Democrats inclined to vote for her. brooklynite Dec 2015 #2

Finally a honest Hillary supporter. bl968 Dec 2015 #12

No, but believe it if it makes you feel better... brooklynite Dec 2015 #14

You are deluding yourself bl968 Dec 2015 #15

I think you're a bit deluded on this.... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #26

Here's the prediction from Western Illinois Univ. Presidential Prediction polls for 2016. They Cal33 Dec 2015 #37

A dishonest Sanders supporters would assume that everyone else will vote for Sanders... Thor_MN Dec 2015 #18

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #20

Ah, the "secret voters" argument... brooklynite Dec 2015 #23

Not Secret liberalmike27 Dec 2015 #29

They are "secret" in that they avoid showing up in any polling analysis brooklynite Dec 2015 #36

Yeahup..... daleanime Dec 2015 #3

She is kicking ass and well ahead. In order for your statement to work, we need to see struggle. seabeyond Dec 2015 #4

When she loses the first two primaries it'll be hard for M$M to continue selling the inevitable bit peacebird Dec 2015 #6

Ha. Ok peace. seabeyond Dec 2015 #9

It remains to be seen if the low key approach is going to hurt. joshcryer Dec 2015 #7

Wishing and hoping and planning and praying will not make her lose. Laser102 Dec 2015 #8

Hoping and praying maybe. tecelote Dec 2015 #11

Like the thoughts...doubt the reality. Moostache Dec 2015 #19

Yes. That is why I said "...begin to bring America back to the people." tecelote Dec 2015 #24

I am looking forward to a series of speeches by Sanders as to why Obama could not keep DhhD Dec 2015 #27

did i do any of that in my op? retrowire Dec 2015 #13

Hillary is not really triangulating . . . Gamecock Lefty Dec 2015 #16

Yes she is circling... MattSh Dec 2015 #34

Clinton set a 20% reduction in drug prices with Big Pharma if We the People will vote for her to DhhD Dec 2015 #35

lol, if you are really willing to fall for an obvious attempt to dance around a straight answer retrowire Dec 2015 #39

This post is in response to Bernie being called.... asuhornets Dec 2015 #17

+1 Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #22

Sanders is responsibile to We the Peopls and has no need to triangulate from persmission from DhhD Dec 2015 #31

Oh, my! Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #21

mock the posts, because you can't possibly defend her. ;) retrowire Dec 2015 #40

I am no Hillary fan: baggage, polarizing. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #43

Yep, you just revealed your hand. retrowire Dec 2015 #44

+ 1, well said! Utopian Leftist Dec 2015 #45

Do Third Way pols use "enhance" the same way they use "reform?" merrily Dec 2015 #28

Means liberalmike27 Dec 2015 #30

They have to cut it to save it. merrily Dec 2015 #32

Hillary's going to "enhance" social security? tex-wyo-dem Dec 2015 #38

Great little convenience sample of one you Skidmore Dec 2015 #41

it ain't my job to point it all out to you. retrowire Dec 2015 #42