Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Cha

(319,209 posts)

3. Nothing's wrong.. they fired their national data director, Josh Uretsky for nothing.

Reply to trumad (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 08:19 AM

Dec 2015

And, yes, if it had been Hillary and she fired her national data director.. they wouldn't be sitting back and saying .. let's give Hillary the benefit of the doubt. LOL

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I won't pig pile on this Bernie Data Breach thingy..... [View all] trumad Dec 2015 OP

No doubt about it. Since the news broke... MrWendel Dec 2015 #1

That's nice of you ejbr Dec 2015 #2

Nothing's wrong.. they fired their national data director, Josh Uretsky for nothing. Cha Dec 2015 #3

No ejbr Dec 2015 #4

trumad's right though. joshcryer Dec 2015 #5

Why did they fire Josh Uretsky? Cha Dec 2015 #6

A vote model was downloaded. joshcryer Dec 2015 #7

aka Cheating VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #26

Also, he instructed 3 others to access forbidden data! Hortensis Dec 2015 #31

It's difficult too imagine the level ... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #9

All the stops would be Cha Dec 2015 #17

Immediately there would be a post saying Hillary was behind it treestar Dec 2015 #23

K&R! stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #8

Oh hell yes ronnykmarshall Dec 2015 #10

GD-B!... SidDithers Dec 2015 #12

Yep, Hillary set the whole thing up. leftofcool Dec 2015 #15

yes, I've seen it described as a character test treestar Dec 2015 #22

And rightly so. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #41

That's nice honey ronnykmarshall Dec 2015 #45

Thanks for your OP. BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #11

Indeed, this is the hypocrisy laid bare Tarc Dec 2015 #13

Probably more like 400 recs. nt Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #40

Ah, strawmen arguments. So strong and well-founded Roland99 Dec 2015 #14

Good comment on the situation, and I agree. beerandjesus Dec 2015 #16

Nice Dean scream attempt! Helen Borg Dec 2015 #18

I've been missing your meta posts Capt. Obvious Dec 2015 #19

So this one should be a feast for your eyes. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #24

That is one fire that is not in need of more gasoline DFW Dec 2015 #20

ha! Trumad the Pyromaniac leave a flame unattended? Dream on. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #25

That kind of comment doesn't distinguish itself radically from the one it was trashing, IMHO. DFW Dec 2015 #35

How's the weather up there on your high horse? sheesh. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #36

A lot cleaner than down there in the sewer, I'll bet. DFW Dec 2015 #38

Well, honestly you saw fit to post in this thread. If you really agreed with what Hiraeth Dec 2015 #42

+1 million treestar Dec 2015 #21

This is still a pig pile, just with another target. Bubzer Dec 2015 #27

There have been plenty of rabid posts already, though not from you personally. merrily Dec 2015 #28

So why is the DNC not firing the data company RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #29

That is a good question. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #37

Might I interject that the Sanders group notified NGP-VAN months ago about the problem LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #30

Perpetual Victimhood redstateblues Dec 2015 #32

Agree Renew Deal Dec 2015 #33

If the Clinton campaign had been caught doing this, I would be very very mad Gothmog Dec 2015 #34

The scream for Hillary's blood workinclasszero Dec 2015 #39

I agree ismnotwasm Dec 2015 #43

Good post trumad Dec 2015 #44