Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

randys1

(16,286 posts)
51. I like the way you laid this out, let me add one question to your deal here
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 06:32 PM
Dec 2015

If everything, absolutely everything BlueCheese says is 100% accurate, did it make sense for DWS to go to the press instead of handle this in house given the damage it has caused BOTH CANDIDATES?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R RandySF Dec 2015 #1
Thank you for this detailed explanation. I hope this will put the obfuscation to rest. BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #2
Well, that's disappointing. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #3
Rove dpatbrown Dec 2015 #46
Let me educate you a bit: Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #49
Let me get this right. dpatbrown Dec 2015 #50
Now you're just being silly. I ain't playing Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #54
So far, there has been one leader standing tall and taking action and that person is Bernie Sanders. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #4
Except for that part in the debate... yallerdawg Dec 2015 #7
Hillary is up in the polls, her campaign workers are doing a good job, they do not need to copy Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #21
He was FORCED to submit to an audit!!! That's why Sanders was cut off! Sancho Dec 2015 #37
After the independent audit we will see who did what. All of the excuses will continue Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #41
This is respect post for you. Phlem Dec 2015 #57
I will wait for the result of an independent audit rather than taking DNC hacks at their word Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #5
The sources above are from... BlueCheese Dec 2015 #6
So not one neutral source, got it Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #10
You can't just deny every source that doesn't fit your worldview. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #11
And you can't deny that there has not been an independent investigation Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #12
An independent account of what? That there was a bug in the system? randome Dec 2015 #14
An independent account of how many times the firewalls went down... Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #19
Which would, in the end, benefit no one. randome Dec 2015 #22
Well blame that on the DNC as their handling of this has benefited no one Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #23
When DWS went to the press with this... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #28
Well Happenstance24 Dec 2015 #18
I would not support prosecuting Cosby without an independent investigation. Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #20
Sen Sanders will see more and more of this Swiftboating by the 1% that have the resources and rhett o rick Dec 2015 #15
Josh Uretsky is a Swiftboater? BlueCheese Dec 2015 #16
Isn't it amazing how much the 1% can do with unlimited funds? They will do anything to put rhett o rick Dec 2015 #35
Sanders is being swiftboated from within. This just keeps getting better. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #32
Thank you so much for taking time to pull this together and one Word... riversedge Dec 2015 #8
It took a long time, but I've seen these claims made repeatedly as if they were fact. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #9
Your reply is hardly unbiased angrychair Dec 2015 #25
I'm more than allowed to base my conclusions on what's known so far. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #27
In regard to your first question... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #29
I agree with you. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #30
To your points angrychair Dec 2015 #48
Thanks for this. Hopefully DUers will take the time to educate themselves. (eom) oasis Dec 2015 #13
They won't. eom 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2015 #52
It's nothing new. Zealots believe what they want to believe. (eom) oasis Dec 2015 #55
The lack of comprehension from so many is boggling Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #17
Your entire thread falls apart because... TheProgressive Dec 2015 #24
and if they really had dirt on Bernie retrowire Dec 2015 #44
K&R Starry Messenger Dec 2015 #26
I don't find your research convincing. It's another partisan smear. philly_bob Dec 2015 #31
No obligation to argue. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #33
Yeah, "smear" was strong. Should have said more neutral "assertions." /nt philly_bob Dec 2015 #39
Thank you for that. nt BlueCheese Dec 2015 #40
Great op. Thank you for taking the time. nt. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #34
K AND R! Thank you for info. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #36
An excellent summary... Sancho Dec 2015 #38
Worst of all, the Sanders campaign failed to inform Bernie himself! It wasn't till 24 hours after pnwmom Dec 2015 #42
Did Sanders say that? n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #45
i wonder why the DNC gave him all his data back retrowire Dec 2015 #43
You forgot the minor detail that the DNC broke their contract with Sanders. jeff47 Dec 2015 #47
I like the way you laid this out, let me add one question to your deal here randys1 Dec 2015 #51
Don't give up your day job. Elmer S. E. Dump Dec 2015 #53
Not looking good for Bernie. Will he withdraw from the race? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #56
Bwahahaha! RichVRichV Dec 2015 #58
I acknowledged as much upthread. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #59
If they want to prove any claims then they should show the relevant log files. RichVRichV Dec 2015 #60
Amen to your last paragraph. murielm99 Dec 2015 #61
The ridiculous conspiracy theories that have been repeatedly dragged up... BlueCheese Dec 2015 #62
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Cleaning up a few questio...»Reply #51