2016 Postmortem

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)

83. Nothing hyperbolic about it

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 09:42 PM

Jan 2016

Please address all the issues brought up in this OP and why they are wrong, or you might just want to back off your hyperbolic bullshit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

138 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Whoa... 'Liberal Group Demands DNC Chairwoman (DWS) Resign - TheHill [View all] WillyT Jan 2016 OP

She's the most corrupt Democrat in the last 50 years AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #1

Hyperbole much? dlwickham Jan 2016 #26

No AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #58

Zell Miller? -nt Bradical79 Jan 2016 #76

I wouldn't say he's corrupt dlwickham Jan 2016 #81

Rod Blagojevich dlwickham Jan 2016 #82

Nothing hyperbolic about it passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #83

The most corrupt Democrat in 50 years? dlwickham Jan 2016 #116

Election fraud? AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #132

what election fraud? dlwickham Jan 2016 #138

I've Really Tried Very Hard To Understand This Support ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #106

Wrong: She is stong Dem woman: that can stand up lewebley3 Jan 2016 #30

If that's actually true, then why MynameisBlarney Jan 2016 #45

DWS has only helped the Dem's: your comments just lewebley3 Jan 2016 #115

Yea, Myname is Blarney.. pangaia Jan 2016 #129

I have done been tolded, lol. MynameisBlarney Jan 2016 #136

When has she ever stood up? Gore1FL Jan 2016 #55

Sanders supporters bulling: lewebley3 Jan 2016 #56

What? Bradical79 Jan 2016 #73

Wut? Hey, stop trashing bowling. BeanMusical Jan 2016 #99

I am not: I am standing up against Sanders bullies lewebley3 Jan 2016 #111

Huh? BeanMusical Jan 2016 #113

Hey, man. What do the Eagles have to do with bullriding? pangaia Jan 2016 #131

What is a 'side attack?' pangaia Jan 2016 #130

Her whole intent is to grease the skids for Hillary Clinton AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #61

You don't know anything about her whole intentions: Your lewebley3 Jan 2016 #122

She barely tries to hide it AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #124

Are you dating the woman: or just using your minding reading lewebley3 Jan 2016 #125

I'm talking about her public actions AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #128

Wo bu dong. pangaia Jan 2016 #133

She's stong? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #84

Wrong in this case is only Sanders supporters word lewebley3 Jan 2016 #112

OMG - blowing coffee through my nose - thx! nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #127

A strong woman who can stand up against the citizenry. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #103

Sanders is not the citizenry: He is a contender in fight lewebley3 Jan 2016 #109

You forgot the sarcasm thingy. pangaia Jan 2016 #126

She will step down after this election cycly. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #2

No: any day she stays on is foolish. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #5

She will be gone after this election cycle. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #6

Why would it be foolish to replace her NOW? Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #19

The nomination of HRC for president. zeemike Jan 2016 #29

One more reason to kick her out of the chair, then. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #94

O'Malley is just as bad to me angrychair Jan 2016 #46

Really didn't need to tell me. Pretty easy one to assume. Happy Thursday. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #48

Jim Dean would be a better choice for the position. Duckfan Jan 2016 #59

I love the Van Jones suggestion. He is total class and intelligence. libdem4life Jan 2016 #85

Indeed: he'd be pefect for the position, and help to reassure the nearly revolting left wing. eom Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #95

I'm amazed how he keeps his cool, and just makes point after point...unaffable. libdem4life Jan 2016 #137

More Sander loser whinning: Debbies not corrupt: Your guy lewebley3 Jan 2016 #36

She's a loser of elections unless of course getting Republicans elected is your thing. nc4bo Jan 2016 #47

Sanders trash talk: Hillary is crushing him: lewebley3 Jan 2016 #118

Did you mean Whinnying? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #117

From your keyboard to the goddesses' ears in the heavens! BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #10

The verbiage you present is much better. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #12

Or Bernie will be doing the replacing truebluegreen Jan 2016 #34

ok. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #35

My thought exactly. eom BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #43

Thanks for that link. n/t Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #18

No Dem Revolt:just Sanders supporter nonsense lewebley3 Jan 2016 #37

Part of it, maybe, but most of it is Republican-supporting "news"paper nonsense. BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #49

Wrong DWS has been a good leader: You just want her lewebley3 Jan 2016 #60

For the record, I'm a Hillary Clinton supporter, so you're wrong there. BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #74

Is it possible you are doing your imitation of someone who is ... immoderate Jan 2016 #135

She has a lot of support from many Dem's lewebley3 Jan 2016 #31

You really meant to say Corporate Dems Duckfan Jan 2016 #65

No: I mean all Dem's: Corporate Dems is Sanders rhetoric lewebley3 Jan 2016 #108

I am a Floridian. bullsnarfle Jan 2016 #107

I own a house in florida: I know DWS has been great! lewebley3 Jan 2016 #110

Right. Let's wait till after we lose big again radiclib Jan 2016 #51

We sure do have to do a lot better down ticket, that's for sure. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #54

That is her term: She should go on to greater things lewebley3 Jan 2016 #53

"greater things" TSIAS Jan 2016 #90

only Sanders people are mistaken about DWS future: lewebley3 Jan 2016 #123

Bad headline. It should read, "Democrats Demand Debbie Wasserman-Schultz to resign", otherwise BlueCaliDem Jan 2016 #3

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #63

She needs to git gone, like yesterday! nt nc4bo Jan 2016 #4

Absolutely. Duckfan Jan 2016 #62

Under DWS Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate Scuba Jan 2016 #7

Heckuva job, Brownie Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #87

Precisely. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #97

...! KoKo Jan 2016 #105

CREDO is no "group". RandySF Jan 2016 #8

It goes deeper than that RandySF but you probably already knew that. nt nc4bo Jan 2016 #9

Uh-huh Plucketeer Jan 2016 #23

Just google "CREDO" RandySF Jan 2016 #40

I used their service for years because of their political stances Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #44

I'm still proudly a CREDO subscriber, and hopefully they have the phones that many want here... cascadiance Jan 2016 #77

I know who they are Plucketeer Jan 2016 #52

Me too. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #98

Agreed: I Hear about them from Norm Goldman lewebley3 Jan 2016 #32

They what the what now? BeanMusical Jan 2016 #100

No! we are NOT horses. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #119

Moot point lewebley3 Jan 2016 #120

Aren't your batteries running low yet? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #121

I signed Credo's petition. ananda Jan 2016 #11

No way credo's got to: bashing a Dem lewebley3 Jan 2016 #38

Even spelled backward what you say doesn't make sense. BeanMusical Jan 2016 #101

And the article didn't even mention how she has endorsed Repubs over Dems in Florida. Punkingal Jan 2016 #13

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #67

but here it's okay to advocate not voting Dem, like with Lamont MisterP Jan 2016 #89

She won't resign until HRC gives her a cabinet post. EndElectoral Jan 2016 #14

She'll have a job at the Clinton Foundation. Fuddnik Jan 2016 #20

DWS will have any job she wants because is doing a good job lewebley3 Jan 2016 #41

Oh, yeah, great job Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #88

Since when has DWS responsible for Dem getting elected lewebley3 Jan 2016 #114

She won't resign because she is doing a good job lewebley3 Jan 2016 #33

Yes we must pad Clinton's every option so she wins, Right. Phlem Jan 2016 #64

And I suppose you can screw up in your job costing the company money and still keep your position? Duckfan Jan 2016 #68

Sounds like she wants to head the DEA, or maybe the DOJ. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #92

Personally I think it should say, Democrats Demand DWS Resign... SoapBox Jan 2016 #15

She will be gone after this election cycle. left-of-center2012 Jan 2016 #16

The evidence of DWS's malfeasance of office... gregcrawford Jan 2016 #17

They're just now figuring out that she doesn't like Progressives? Fuddnik Jan 2016 #21

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #22

she's Obama's choice. call him nt msongs Jan 2016 #24

I just signed the Credo petition 30 minutes ago! in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #25

Jesus--that's a few more than four or five paragraphs! nt MADem Jan 2016 #27

I signed Credos petition mountain grammy Jan 2016 #28

I doubt CREDO's demand will have much impact onenote Jan 2016 #39

She's a fraud who endorses Republicans. Why is she the DNC head again? CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #42

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #66

She most certainly did. Educate yourself. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #70

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #71

The Washington Post isn't a "reputable outlet"? Oookay. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #72

When fools cannot refute facts, they attack the source. [n/t] Maedhros Jan 2016 #134

Turncoat Debbie has got to go n/t AZ Progressive Jan 2016 #50

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #57

Like I said before, Van Jones would be a perfect pick for the position. Duckfan Jan 2016 #69

I dislike the woman. azmom Jan 2016 #75

Pres. Obama can fire her. Why doesn't he? Duppers Jan 2016 #78

Remove Debbie Wasserman Schultz genwah Jan 2016 #79

K&R Thanks for posting. eom Purveyor Jan 2016 #80

DWS has got a Primary Challenge!!! liskddksil Jan 2016 #86

YEOW cprise Jan 2016 #91

She's Vile billhicks76 Jan 2016 #93

It must be rough being reviled by the rank and file. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #96

Sign all the petitions you can, it will not change the Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #102

Democracy versus capitalism. This thing still works. Gregorian Jan 2016 #104