Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

(29,135 posts)

10. Hope you bothered to read the SOP and member posting guidelines.

Mon May 7, 2012, 12:06 AM

May 2012

Yes, we do have a very "active and interesting 'little' area here." It's not for disruptors, however.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a funny thing... [View all] redqueen May 2012 OP

Oh and also, redqueen May 2012 #1

Yes, the issue is not that it's wrong that we're objectified, redqueen May 2012 #6

I know, huh?... Little Star May 2012 #8

and now we're getting it iverglas May 2012 #18

Jerry Springer ;) iverglas May 2012 #20

here is one... boston bean May 2012 #3

wink... lol. nt seabeyond May 2012 #4

All that, plus it doesnt matter MadrasT May 2012 #7

"encompassing nature of P" What does this mean? Number23 May 2012 #9

Hope you bothered to read the SOP and member posting guidelines. BlueIris May 2012 #10

The P is just a quicker way of referring to the patriarchy... redqueen May 2012 #11

Gotcha. Thanks for the info. Number23 May 2012 #16

hey 23 seabeyond May 2012 #12

Thanks, seabeyond. Good to see you too Number23 May 2012 #15

Cecilia Payne, in case you were wondering. :) redqueen May 2012 #13

... redqueen May 2012 #17

Fuck the divisive framing of all mothering issues! redqueen May 2012 #21

:-) MadrasT May 2012 #22

Common Arguments against Feminism redqueen Jun 2012 #23