Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

iverglas

(38,549 posts)
38. everything a prominent personage does is newsworthy
Wed May 9, 2012, 12:55 PM
May 2012

My perspective is that women who play to the stereotype -- the extreme hairstyling, the makeup mask, the porny shoes -- put their own appearance in issue. They are the ones who choose to do that, by significantly altering their appearance to achieve an advantage in public life --or to avoid the disadvantage that would likely come with not doing that, granted. Because yes, unfortunately, any choice a woman makes in this regard is a statement of sorts. A woman can't just "be herself" without it being a statement that she is rejecting what women are expected to be and do, appearance-wise.

That's the world we live in. I would comment on a woman's hyper-unnatural appearance: bleached blonde, heavy make-up, stilletto heels, whatever. Women in the public eye who do that, obviously do it for a reason. They don't expect it to pass unnoticed. What's actually unfortunate is that it would also not pass unnoticed if a woman did not do it from the outset: if a woman entered public life with ungelled hair, unpainted face and flat shoes and just stayed that way. It would be seen as worthy of comment that she chose not to conform to stereotype.

Clinton conformed when she chose not to wear trousers while she was acting the role of helpmeet to the president. She did it every time she had her hair coloured and styled, and painted the makeup on. Her appearance when she chose not to do that was noteworthy because it was a clear and very particular choice that deviated from long practice, and it was newsworthy because she is a prominent personage.

I will still say that it is analogous to a prominent man who had always appeared with significant changes to his natural appearance and then one day didn't -- put on specs, grew out the grey and maybe stopped shaving.

It's just that few men start out in such an altered state. They start out in their natural state and stay that way, as it changes. If women did that too, there wouldn't be anything to note or put in the news.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R for Hillary! nt gateley May 2012 #1
This is why we don't have nice things Crow73 May 2012 #2
nice things? nt seabeyond May 2012 #5
It's a cute, ironic play on an old cliche. The "nice things" in the tblue37 May 2012 #20
lol. that is great. appreciate it. i didnt eve kinda connect that. nt seabeyond May 2012 #26
point. not something that deserves ANY time and attention so seabeyond May 2012 #3
I think this is great, but also, as a 68-year-old woman, I just can't believe that this is enough May 2012 #4
It's just so god damned ridiculous isn't it? boston bean May 2012 #6
Nice. MadrasT May 2012 #7
It's so obviously a double standard, that I am suprised a boston bean May 2012 #8
"It's like we're going backwards." it isnt LIKE. its beyond backward. new territory. seabeyond May 2012 #9
Very true. Thanks. JDPriestly May 2012 #17
sigh... seabeyond May 2012 #18
I think she looks fantastic! hedda_foil May 2012 #10
agreed. on another thread someone asked, would they put up a repug woman picture. the point seabeyond May 2012 #11
where was the other post. I didn't see it and can't find it. is it on DU? nt boston bean May 2012 #22
getting the link i see it was put albright or rice picture. seabeyond May 2012 #25
Great pic of her IMO: I like her more than ever because of it struggle4progress May 2012 #12
i know you are being supportive but it isnt about if she looks fine or not seabeyond May 2012 #13
I didn't say anything about how she looked: I said that it was a great pic and struggle4progress May 2012 #14
cool. thanks for correcting me struggle. nt seabeyond May 2012 #16
what would make you like her more because of that picture? boston bean May 2012 #23
speaking for myself iverglas May 2012 #28
I don't disagree boston bean May 2012 #29
framed in terms of age iverglas May 2012 #30
I do not find it newsworthy at all. boston bean May 2012 #31
everything a prominent personage does is newsworthy iverglas May 2012 #38
just because it is noteworthy, does not mean it is newsworthy. even biting their tongue, which they seabeyond May 2012 #33
" a decade or so ago, even the newsrooms knew they had a line." redqueen May 2012 #35
i have looked at this and thought about it. seabeyond May 2012 #37
I agree that the positive focus on (almost always women's) appearance is problematic, redqueen May 2012 #32
i dont know how many threads at the beginning of the term i walked in and said, she is smart seabeyond May 2012 #34
Yep. redqueen May 2012 #36
Good for her! Free at last! JDPriestly May 2012 #15
It really has nothing to do with age. boston bean May 2012 #21
How is this news? The obsession with her appearance is sexist. McCamy Taylor May 2012 #19
I'm at that age and I say more power to her. She is GREAT! teewrex May 2012 #24
A-fricken-men! Lugnut May 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»TRENDING: Clinton address...»Reply #38