Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

iverglas

(38,549 posts)
18. who casts men in those roles?
Tue May 15, 2012, 02:50 PM
May 2012

I'd rather have seen a movie with Gene Wilder in it than 10 movies with yer average beefcake. Not just because I always thought he was gorgeous.

I also think you'll find it's the persona as much as the appearance that women go for. Cary Grant, the suave sophisticate, Pierce Brosnan, the suave and also sensitive one, Tom Hanks, the sensitive and funny one, and like that. I've done a bad job of cultural diversity here; I will plead that I am too old to be as intimately familiar with African-American stars, for instance, since they were fewer and farther between when I was paying more attention. Aha, Sidney Poitier, the suave and politically admirable one.

And you absolutely don't find the same stereotypical cookie-cutter appearance among male stars. A limited range of appearance, maybe, but a lot less limited.

Besides, most movies are still made for male audiences, and it isn't the female audience's preferences that are the driving force behind cast selection.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The mind is what turns me on exboyfil May 2012 #1
an interesting seabeyond May 2012 #4
Looks can grow in more than one direction, too arcane1 May 2012 #8
yes... agreed. i was thinking that as typing seabeyond May 2012 #9
I wonder what percentage of men would read that and actually "get it".... hlthe2b May 2012 #2
Few, I suspect. redqueen May 2012 #14
Just wondering, aren't men objectified by women? Aren't men cast in roles upaloopa May 2012 #3
Yes, it is also done to men, just 5x less often. redqueen May 2012 #11
I'm throwing this out just as another "I wonder if." upaloopa May 2012 #20
you have a point and i do love your post. seabeyond May 2012 #21
"Someone with a healthy body acceptance can't be objectified" is a meaningless statement. redqueen May 2012 #22
who casts men in those roles? iverglas May 2012 #18
Is liking GW that different than liking small boobs? unc70 May 2012 #23
heh heh iverglas May 2012 #25
Really? This is the issue you've decided to make your passion? n/t Dawgs May 2012 #5
Welcome to the History of Feminism Group. Please read the SOP. redqueen May 2012 #12
you might peruse the threads in the lounge and take a look at the one that starts seabeyond May 2012 #17
Sad. Six years old and already aware of the importance of hotness. redqueen May 2012 #19
Really? Pathetic disruption is the way to spend your time on this site? BlueIris May 2012 #24
Well how about this TexasProgresive May 2012 #6
It's good that there are so many men who see women as people and not sex objects. redqueen May 2012 #13
The final paragraph is worth clicking the link for. arcane1 May 2012 #7
ah... good for you posting this. lol. i didnt go in and read the whole. seabeyond May 2012 #10
there's often not a lot to be added ;) iverglas May 2012 #15
Your last paragrah summed it up quite well. redqueen May 2012 #16
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Why 'I prefer small boobs...»Reply #18