Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
11. It's supposed to be against the rules, but yes...jurors won't "hide" it, if they agree w/substance
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:22 PM
Sep 2012

if they agree w/the substance of the post of the guy who name called troll. They simply ignore the rules, if they like the offending post's ultimate message.

Not all jurors, of course. Just some.

I also saw a post once reference that he was noting the author of a post, so that he could take revenge as a juror on any alerts that may come his way on that poster (meaning he would always vote to hide the posts).

I try to play by the rules. I hope I do that. Even if I like the offending poster's message, if they cross the line, I vote to hide. Even if I hate the offending poster's message, but it didn't cross the line or break the rules, I vote to leave it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»DU Community Help»Someone called me a troll...»Reply #11