Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

In reply to the discussion: It's not Monday yet. [View all]
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
16. That's a hoax. Lynch said no such thing.
Fri Jun 17, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

My first reaction to the quotation was that it was inconceivable to me that Lynch would actually say that. If you go to Facebook, it's obvious that some right-winger simply opened an account as "Loretta Lynch, Attorney General". The posts by that account rely on such sources as The Weekly Standard and Breitbart.

As you'd expect, major obsessions are transphobia and Islamophobia. As an example of the former, on May 11 there was a post linking to an article on "redflagnews.com" about the North Carolina bathroom fracas, in response to which this supposed "Loretta Lynch" posted:

Loretta Lynch and the entire Democrat Party make progress towards ending the quaint, antiquated and artificial nonsense of separate bathrooms for men and women.


Come on, "Democrat Party"? and the old anti-ERA standby of unisex bathrooms? They're not even being very creative.

Incidentally, I'd never before heard of redflagnews.com, but feel free to go there if you want to read how "Obama Imports 1 Million Muslims During Presidency" and "FBI Says No One Killed at Sandy Hook". I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that the real Loretta Lynch doesn't rely on or even read this site.

The particular post supposedly assuring all that Clinton won't be indicted links to this article in The Weekly Standard, but even that right-wing rag says no such thing. It merely notes an upcoming meeting between the President and the Attorney General (imagine that), and says, "The topic of Obama's closed door meeting with Lynch has not been made public." In fact, the article reports the administration's position as being pretty much the opposite of what this post claims:

White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that President Obama's endorsement of Hillary Clinton will not "sway" the ongoing FBI investigation into Clinton.


I'm not familiar with Sourceplanet but they got played big-time.
It's not Monday yet. [View all] LWolf Jun 2016 OP
Excellent analysis; K&R'd & bookmarked. snot Jun 2016 #1
That's what I thought. nt LWolf Jun 2016 #2
:) snot Jun 2016 #4
thank you, very interesting swhisper1 Jun 2016 #3
Her OP was hidden? Autumn Jun 2016 #5
Yes. LWolf Jun 2016 #7
That shows the future here doesn't it? Autumn Jun 2016 #8
If I understand the coming rules... Lars39 Jun 2016 #13
Isn't that special? Contrary1 Jun 2016 #38
Ayup. And alerts won't be in context either. Lars39 Jun 2016 #45
I believe it shows how things will go. Juries will hide anything like that imo Arazi Jun 2016 #18
I also think that part of the plan is to give Bernie supporters Contrary1 Jun 2016 #20
Although I have multiple hides now, I was removed from jury duty before I got the rhett o rick Jun 2016 #32
It sure does, LWolf Jun 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #51
I can't believe it, either. senz Jun 2016 #14
There are a few posters on DU that are not here seeking honest discussions or even rhett o rick Jun 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author senz Jun 2016 #39
I've noticed. senz Jun 2016 #44
Just saw this; would love to see the author's response: snot Jun 2016 #6
That's a hoax. Lynch said no such thing. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #16
re the Loretta Lynch Facebook post NJCher Jun 2016 #17
or, one could read this: niyad Jun 2016 #9
I see you've been busy. LWolf Jun 2016 #10
well, for one thing, that wasn't my OP, but thanks for playing. niyad Jun 2016 #11
No, your OP was a dupe of that one. nt LWolf Jun 2016 #24
Wrong group. Bye bye Autumn Jun 2016 #15
" it’s extremely important that you remember precisely who pays the FBI’s bills" Fumesucker Jun 2016 #12
In the future make sure you post this in your OPs Autumn Jun 2016 #21
I'll be sure to do so. LWolf Jun 2016 #22
No one can't be too careful here. Autumn Jun 2016 #23
Good advice on OP's RobertEarl Jun 2016 #25
In the future I recommend that progressive trash GD and stick to the BS Group rhett o rick Jun 2016 #47
Have you seen all the jury hides on posts and OPs in our group? Autumn Jun 2016 #48
Yeah I hear you. What do you suggest? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #50
I wish I could talk to you all privately...........I dunno why bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #26
Talking about her policy will = an attack here. Nothing but boot licking will survive. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #27
Any criticism of Hillary by males is viewed by some as sexist. "You wouldn't criticize a man for rhett o rick Jun 2016 #31
I damn SURE would criticize a man for having the same policy. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #35
Exactly. But when we tried to be critical, we were met with accusations of being racists. It's a rhett o rick Jun 2016 #37
If she wants to play with big boys she's going to get her hands dirty. Acting like she's onecaliberal Jun 2016 #41
Criticism of Hillary by females is also viewed as sexist. senz Jun 2016 #42
About my thread jillan Jun 2016 #28
Thanks for explaining. LWolf Jun 2016 #29
It's so ironic because that is what my thread was about. People either get it or they don't. jillan Jun 2016 #40
We just have to deal with the fact that Progressives are not welcome here, we rhett o rick Jun 2016 #30
A few questions come to mind. One, will Obama pardon Clinton for all possible crimes rhett o rick Jun 2016 #33
Those are good questions LWolf Jun 2016 #34
And are they investigating the Clinton Foundation? senz Jun 2016 #43
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #46
lol LWolf Jun 2016 #49
This article should be required reading The Blue Flower Jun 2016 #52
And you, as well. nt LWolf Jun 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»It's not Monday yet.»Reply #16