Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: It's not Monday yet. [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)16. That's a hoax. Lynch said no such thing.
My first reaction to the quotation was that it was inconceivable to me that Lynch would actually say that. If you go to Facebook, it's obvious that some right-winger simply opened an account as "Loretta Lynch, Attorney General". The posts by that account rely on such sources as The Weekly Standard and Breitbart.
As you'd expect, major obsessions are transphobia and Islamophobia. As an example of the former, on May 11 there was a post linking to an article on "redflagnews.com" about the North Carolina bathroom fracas, in response to which this supposed "Loretta Lynch" posted:
Loretta Lynch and the entire Democrat Party make progress towards ending the quaint, antiquated and artificial nonsense of separate bathrooms for men and women.
Come on, "Democrat Party"? and the old anti-ERA standby of unisex bathrooms? They're not even being very creative.
Incidentally, I'd never before heard of redflagnews.com, but feel free to go there if you want to read how "Obama Imports 1 Million Muslims During Presidency" and "FBI Says No One Killed at Sandy Hook". I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that the real Loretta Lynch doesn't rely on or even read this site.
The particular post supposedly assuring all that Clinton won't be indicted links to this article in The Weekly Standard, but even that right-wing rag says no such thing. It merely notes an upcoming meeting between the President and the Attorney General (imagine that), and says, "The topic of Obama's closed door meeting with Lynch has not been made public." In fact, the article reports the administration's position as being pretty much the opposite of what this post claims:
White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that President Obama's endorsement of Hillary Clinton will not "sway" the ongoing FBI investigation into Clinton.
I'm not familiar with Sourceplanet but they got played big-time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Although I have multiple hides now, I was removed from jury duty before I got the
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#32
There are a few posters on DU that are not here seeking honest discussions or even
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#36
" it’s extremely important that you remember precisely who pays the FBI’s bills"
Fumesucker
Jun 2016
#12
In the future I recommend that progressive trash GD and stick to the BS Group
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#47
Talking about her policy will = an attack here. Nothing but boot licking will survive.
onecaliberal
Jun 2016
#27
Any criticism of Hillary by males is viewed by some as sexist. "You wouldn't criticize a man for
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#31
Exactly. But when we tried to be critical, we were met with accusations of being racists. It's a
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#37
If she wants to play with big boys she's going to get her hands dirty. Acting like she's
onecaliberal
Jun 2016
#41
It's so ironic because that is what my thread was about. People either get it or they don't.
jillan
Jun 2016
#40
We just have to deal with the fact that Progressives are not welcome here, we
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#30
A few questions come to mind. One, will Obama pardon Clinton for all possible crimes
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#33