Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

Cleita

(75,480 posts)

4. Actually it was Ed Schultz to Bernie when he interviewed him on his

Reply to Autumn (Reply #3)

Tue May 19, 2015, 05:36 PM

May 2015

show today to explain the bill. Bernie didn't correct him. I guess he didn't want to distract from the purpose of the interview. Also Ed seemed to be positively in favor of the idea, which is why I got so upset. Our side can't be giving the opposition any fuel for fire. It's a very bad label IMHO

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stop calling Bernie's bill to fund college for all American kids [View all] Cleita May 2015 OP

The High Frequency Trader Tax perhaps /nt think May 2015 #1

In a just and proper society, it would never occur to anyone to use such language. randys1 May 2015 #2

Which republican idiot is saying that? Autumn May 2015 #3

Actually it was Ed Schultz to Bernie when he interviewed him on his Cleita May 2015 #4

I get what you're saying, but none of the corporate media, even Ed & Rachel, is on "our side." Ed Suspicious May 2015 #6

Well I was half right. If Ed Schultz said that he's an idiot. Autumn May 2015 #7

Schultz has been an idiot for sometime now... eom Purveyor May 2015 #28

I heard about this tax some years back cilla4progress May 2015 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author aspirant May 2015 #8

Wasn't Robin Hood the good guy of the story? And wasn't Robin just a response A Simple Game May 2015 #9

Gotta disagree. Every time you allow people to think they are paying Cleita May 2015 #11

Yeah you're probably right. You shouldn't be but you probably are. A Simple Game May 2015 #14

You are absolutely correct. Not long ago I heard that a US tractor company rhett o rick May 2015 #29

In turn, you could probably end the Pell Grant program if we did this bluestateguy May 2015 #10

You could end a lot of stuff like that. Just simply make college Cleita May 2015 #12

With the amount of unemployment we have.... daleanime May 2015 #17

Getting into The University of California wasn't a lark. Cleita May 2015 #18

Ironic. The conservatives have almost completely gotten rid of the concept of investing in ourselves jtuck004 May 2015 #13

It was natural for the Republicans to sneak into the camp of their enemies, Democrats, GoneFishin May 2015 #15

The conservatives see Education as a privatized profit center. Thor_MN May 2015 #23

Crooks 4 College Bill? Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #16

An immense pool of talented, educated employees.... paleotn May 2015 #19

Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast May 2015 #20

The Educational Investment Act. nt Half-Century Man May 2015 #21

We have a winner. Cleita May 2015 #22

We've been calling it that for years. Financial Transaction Tax = Robinhood Tax Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #24

I think it's bad advertising myself. eom Cleita May 2015 #25

But I think the official name of this new thing is the "College For All Act" Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #26

OK Cleita May 2015 #27