Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)73. I was just banned from the Hillary Clinton Group.
(as per Autumn's advice
Frankly, it is surprising it took me so long to become their enemy, given the propensity of Clinton supporters to label any critic of The ANNOINTED One a right-wing nut-job.
Here's is the remark that got me banned: "Clinton could be the figurehead of one more election lost by DWS. She needs to disown DWS as soon as possible."
I guess the new meme is that DWS is doing a swell job being neutral because her performance represents the majority of carefully selected respondents in bought and paid for 'real' polls.
If so, I am proud to be among the banned. I think DWS is bad for the party, and on the erge of damaging it in irreversible ways. Any candidate who cares about the party should insist on her resignation. Only those obsessed with winning at all costs could still have confidence in DWS - as they are the only ones to enjoy DWS's support.
I'd be too moderate a person if I weren't banned. To be outspoken is to be banned? - Let me just take my gloves of...
Frankly, it is surprising it took me so long to become their enemy, given the propensity of Clinton supporters to label any critic of The ANNOINTED One a right-wing nut-job.
Here's is the remark that got me banned: "Clinton could be the figurehead of one more election lost by DWS. She needs to disown DWS as soon as possible."
I guess the new meme is that DWS is doing a swell job being neutral because her performance represents the majority of carefully selected respondents in bought and paid for 'real' polls.
If so, I am proud to be among the banned. I think DWS is bad for the party, and on the erge of damaging it in irreversible ways. Any candidate who cares about the party should insist on her resignation. Only those obsessed with winning at all costs could still have confidence in DWS - as they are the only ones to enjoy DWS's support.
I'd be too moderate a person if I weren't banned. To be outspoken is to be banned? - Let me just take my gloves of...
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Same story here from a couple of months ago. I had the nerve to suggest it was foolish for Hillary
world wide wally
Dec 2015
#50
The heavy hand of censorship banned me minutes ago for posting 'off topic'. One Strike = You're Out!
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#5
That pretty much sums up the paradigm one is likely to encounter in the presence of Clinton's
Betty Karlson
Dec 2015
#7
It seems that HRC is acheiving a division in the Democratic Party, but not too fast.
DhhD
Dec 2015
#38
Up front, Hillary Clinton and DWS aren't my choices, I don't see anything....
marble falls
Dec 2015
#40
Don't sweat it, Betty. Everyone who actually has something to say worth listening to is banned from
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#45
I was never banned cause i didnt join but If I did join, it wouldnt take long to join the ranks of
litlbilly
Dec 2015
#58
Welcome to club. They have no tolerance for dissent - bow down or be kicked out.
bowens43
Dec 2015
#59
We are moving to a centralized committee style government, dissent must be punished in the most
whereisjustice
Dec 2015
#64