Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Washington Post: "Sirota's undisclosed connection to Sanders is a breach of journalistic ethics" [View all]CreekDog
(46,192 posts)57. you said to show the results of the final primaries in 2016:
THIS PROVES THAT SANDERS WON!
2 of them!
Virgin Islands Clinton:87.1% Sanders: 12.9% (result Clinton +74.2)
Puerto Rico Clinton:59.4% Sanders: 37.5% (result Clinton +21.9)
California-- Clinton:53.1% Sanders: 46.0% (result Clinton +7.1)
Montana--- Clinton:44.6% Sanders: 51.0% (result Sanders +6.4)
New Jersey Clinton:63.3% Sanders: 36.7% (result Clinton +26.6)
New Mexico Clinton:51.5% Sanders: 48.5% (result Clinton +3.0)
North Dakota Clinton:25.6% Sanders: 64.2% (result Sanders +38.6)
South Dakota Clinton:51.0% Sanders: 49.0% (result Clinton +2.0)
Wash--D.C. Clinton: 78.7% Sanders: 21.1% (result Clinton +57.6)
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Washington Post: "Sirota's undisclosed connection to Sanders is a breach of journalistic ethics" [View all]
Talking Tom
Mar 2019
OP
To those who believe that one person is the embodiment of ethics and all that is good and right
ehrnst
Mar 2019
#78
When one is used to everyone thinking in unison, with one voice, behind one leader
ehrnst
Mar 2019
#110
Well, Sirota is moving on to a place where ethics have never seem to be an issue
SFnomad
Mar 2019
#11
"Not engaged in 'some sort of secretive political conspiracy for a particular candidate'"
dalton99a
Mar 2019
#16
you apparently don't even know the answer, because it sure doesn't show Bernie winning those
CreekDog
Mar 2019
#53
the only people who want "free college" are those that think they will benefit, and who
MH1
Mar 2019
#103
you ran away from your demand to show the results of the final 2016 primaries:
CreekDog
Mar 2019
#56
was it disclosed now because payments to Sirota are going to show up in the FEC filing?
CreekDog
Mar 2019
#51
Pretend journalist attack dog working for a pretend Democrat. Yeah, let's elect that
NBachers
Mar 2019
#20
I wouldn't say the guy who called me "motherfucker" in 2008 was ever a journalist.
RandySF
Mar 2019
#33
Sirota is taking on the critically important role of vetting Sanders' supporters
CreekDog
Mar 2019
#55
"Sleazy hit piece"? He denied working with the campaign months ago and even went to...
George II
Mar 2019
#108
Looks like there's an upper limit of 3200 tweets that can be "auto-deleted".
NurseJackie
Mar 2019
#93
Transparency is good. This is not good, especially in the first weeks of a campaign.
ehrnst
Mar 2019
#75
I love the idea of the Washington Post lecturing anyone on journalistic ethics.
ProfessorPlum
Mar 2019
#99