Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Rich kids should pay fees to attend public schools. [View all]PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)27. Dear lord no.
Chances are the rich families are already paying property taxes which are the main source of funding for public schools.
I chose to send my sons to a secular private school and was sometimes rather unpopular whenever another parent would say they shouldn't have to pay school taxes. We all have a vested interest in good public schools. Just as those who don't currently have kids in the public school, or maybe never had kids at all, even they should pay school taxes.
But rich kids' families shouldn't have to pay twice.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think that tax equity would do the same thing. That way, they don't have even more impetus
ehrnst
Nov 2019
#2
I will tell you what happened in GA where they implemented the hope scholarship with no
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#51
Poor folks are barely putting food on the table ...they can't afford to pay...
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#62
There is always a public statement...the thing is it shouldn't be used to shame folks.
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#71
Kids always know...no way to stop that and making it free for all even those who don't need it will
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#77
Some do. If Daddy can't get them into the Ivy League school he went to,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#16
If you read the followups the CT posted you'll find this is actually an anti-Pete's position post
mr_lebowski
Nov 2019
#84
Whenever public services are gated by income they become divisive and oppressive.
Voltaire2
Nov 2019
#14
Twisted and a losing issue...have you considered the general and how we craft a winning message?
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#25
That simply isn't true...states have cut funding to the bone for state colleges...and the
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#72
I agree that income-based tuition should not be required to attend a public school.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#34
I don't think property taxes are used for higher ed - they definitely aren't in my state.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#92
The arguments only apply equally if you are advocating for making college compulsory
LongtimeAZDem
Nov 2019
#38
Only the last couple of years, depending on jurisdiction. College is completely optional.
LongtimeAZDem
Nov 2019
#42
So, are you advocating for making college compulsory? If not, then you're just quibbling
LongtimeAZDem
Nov 2019
#57
Public universities are not funded in the same way as public K-12.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#40
The point is that public universities are not funded the same way as K-12,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#55
No, no they used to...but many states have cut the money sent public colleges...and many have closed
Demsrule86
Nov 2019
#64
How about homeschooling households no longer get money for curriculum and p.e. Classes.
Pisces
Nov 2019
#89
the civil service favors military vets which actually disfavors the wealthy who are less likely to
dsc
Nov 2019
#103
It was far clumsier a proposal-- not exaggerated or detailed enough to be satire.
dawg day
Nov 2019
#108