Democratic Primaries

Demsrule86

(71,523 posts)

41. Sanders needs AA vote or he will not be the nominee.

Tue Feb 4, 2020, 04:34 PM

Feb 2020

Same with Warren, and Buttigieg. After what I saw in Iowa...they are not capable in picking even their home candidates. What a mess.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Biden comes up in 4th or 5th place in Iowa [View all] Legends303 Feb 2020 OP

That's not how it works scheming daemons Feb 2020 #1

It's over for Joe... as I've been sayin' for awhile now. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2020 #2

Oh come on. Classy. JudyM Feb 2020 #14

Yes, you've been saying that for several months while he's been the front-runner. You have highplainsdem Feb 2020 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2020 #3

By the sounds of it, he's coming up in 4th place. OliverQ Feb 2020 #4

What data is that? scheming daemons Feb 2020 #5

Internal reporting from the Sanders and Buttigieg campaigns. OliverQ Feb 2020 #10

The less than 2% data. TexasTowelie Feb 2020 #15

Biden was not emmadoggy Feb 2020 #19

Thanks for the on-the-ground report. Mike 03 Feb 2020 #27

CNN reporting that Joe's already disputing the Iowa results... that says a lot!! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2020 #9

lol bernie claiams everything is rigged against him nt msongs Feb 2020 #13

Your opinion and you are entitled to it. Iowa may not be a high point for Biden, but it won't break emmaverybo Feb 2020 #6

How is South Carolina even relevant? OliverQ Feb 2020 #11

Democrats haven't done very well in Wisconsin either for most of the past decade. TexasTowelie Feb 2020 #16

So black voters in S.C. aren't relevant? Lexblues Feb 2020 #21

Iowa is no longer a swing state either lapfog_1 Feb 2020 #22

I was referring to the primary. Don't we have one in S.C.? Regardless of IA or N.H., Biden still emmaverybo Feb 2020 #23

I don't think Iowa is relevant and I don't think they OliverQ Feb 2020 #29

Democrats haven't won Texas since the last time we won SC either; do you think Texas is irrelevant? LongtimeAZDem Feb 2020 #32

You will see SC's relevance when the AAs have a turn to have their say and place Biden in the lead. Skya Rhen Feb 2020 #33

Biden is not going to win. OliverQ Feb 2020 #40

Sanders needs AA vote or he will not be the nominee. Demsrule86 Feb 2020 #41

Delegates, schmelegates BeyondGeography Feb 2020 #7

It could also adversely affect his fundraising ability too. nt Mike 03 Feb 2020 #28

He was already awarded delegates. rwheeler31 Feb 2020 #8

for months he has had low expectations for iowa. wont be news to him nt msongs Feb 2020 #12

No, no, no. You don't get it. jcmaine72 Feb 2020 #17

It's a lily-white state - Biden will crush in South Carolina and your post will seem silly Alhena Feb 2020 #18

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ emmaverybo Feb 2020 #24

Damn. herding cats Feb 2020 #20

Herding cats bdamomma Feb 2020 #26

I don't think it's that bad. musicblind Feb 2020 #25

Nonsense; Iowa is one percent of the pledged delegate total, and Biden has a major lead in states LongtimeAZDem Feb 2020 #30

agree, it's all malarky onetexan Feb 2020 #31

Black voters would like a word. SaschaHM Feb 2020 #34

His support is weak and will get weaker as the primary progresses. Autumn Feb 2020 #36

Yes and the Biden supporters will make excuses Legends303 Feb 2020 #39

A 5 way split of 1% of the delegates is not going to settle this race. OneMoreCupOfCoffee Feb 2020 #37

A reminder that Delegates are not allocated based on Statewide tallies... brooklynite Feb 2020 #38