Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
38. Not the first time. Self serving.
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 04:36 PM
Feb 2020

Last edited Wed Feb 5, 2020, 05:11 PM - Edit history (1)

Collects two months of unemployment. Ran out of benefits, then campaigned for unlimited benefits...for all.

"Sanders, according to an article in 1974 in the Bennington Banner, was one of them. He was on unemployment for a few months in 1971. In subsequent Liberty Union campaigns he advocated for “the doing away with all time limitations for unemployment benefits.”

Under activities 1971 -1976 Involved in making Vermont Educational Television open to local filmmakers.

Under employment 1976 -1981 Wrote and produced educational filmstrips.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

AT THIS HOUR - DELEGATE ESTIMATE [View all] Scurrilous Feb 2020 OP
But but the SURGE Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2020 #1
If Biden cannot beat an admitted socialist I_M_Blue_2 Feb 2020 #34
It's Iowa that is not Diverse and it has Caucuses.. Cha Feb 2020 #39
Good, Bloomberg can defeat Trump the others cannot I_M_Blue_2 Feb 2020 #42
That's your opinion. Cha Feb 2020 #45
Iowa Demographics (So very white.) NurseJackie Feb 2020 #47
Ikr.. and it's really weird to have Cha Feb 2020 #48
Along w/ NH - tiny white and oh so significant. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #50
It's not representative... but those that benefit never want to acknowledge it. NurseJackie Feb 2020 #52
Hmmmmmm Scurrilous Feb 2020 #43
Iowa has tilted left on their vote for a long, long time. Blue_true Feb 2020 #49
Over the weekend I was estimating the delegates: George II Feb 2020 #2
Wonder what the final delegate count will be? Cha Feb 2020 #40
Before Super Tuesday exactly 4% of delegates are up for grabs underpants Feb 2020 #3
Sanders has 6 more delegates than Biden? texasfiddler Feb 2020 #4
Time to eject. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #5
HE'S DOOMED, I TELLS YA! DOOOOOOOOMED! LongtimeAZDem Feb 2020 #9
hE sHoUlD dRoP oUt ImMeDiAtElY!!!! George II Feb 2020 #19
LOL R B Garr Feb 2020 #29
... Scurrilous Feb 2020 #46
I see what you did there! Pololv Feb 2020 #53
Love that Pete stole Bernie's thunder. HarlanPepper Feb 2020 #6
Me too. Bernie worked hard to get these first three. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #12
That sounds like rigging the system. R B Garr Feb 2020 #28
Yes he rigged two out of three. The other favored him heavily. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #37
Also sounds like a thumb on the scale. betsuni Feb 2020 #35
Not the first time. Self serving. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #38
Though I get the obsession with the first steps of a marathon... LanternWaste Feb 2020 #7
Nice. Really nice. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #13
"Too many impatient hipsters" bluewater Feb 2020 #16
Buttigieg won in a race Sanders should have taken in a landslide. That is the good news in this. krissey Feb 2020 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author bluewater Feb 2020 #22
Absolutely HarlanPepper Feb 2020 #32
Way to go, Liz! jayschool2013 Feb 2020 #10
Nice post! +++ still_one Feb 2020 #51
Right? It's less than 1% of the total! And these dopes spend MILLIONS on it. Squinch Feb 2020 #11
$63 million. Scurrilous Feb 2020 #14
Wow. lol. That is a lot of $27s. And then I am hearing he was going to use his win to krissey Feb 2020 #27
Exactly what I've been saying for a couple of weeks. MineralMan Feb 2020 #15
The reason Iowa is not irrelevant is well described here... thesquanderer Feb 2020 #17
Iowa will be forgotten on March 3. Completely. MineralMan Feb 2020 #20
Yes it will be forgotten on March 3. It's still relevant for reasons described at the link. n/t thesquanderer Feb 2020 #21
Nope. Sorry. MineralMan Feb 2020 #23
People do tend to believe numbers that support their candidates and dispute ones that don't. n/t thesquanderer Feb 2020 #33
You were right MineralMan Scurrilous Feb 2020 #18
I don't get it. William769 Feb 2020 #24
Hi, William! murielm99 Feb 2020 #25
You too! William769 Feb 2020 #26
Biden seems worked up about it... brooklynite Feb 2020 #30
Read the comments for the NPR tweet; good illustration of a particular demographic LongtimeAZDem Feb 2020 #31
Yep. Bears this out (found on wiki article about civics education) Scurrilous Feb 2020 #41
I have a feeling Pete is gonna fall behind at 100% Tiggeroshii Feb 2020 #36
because - IOWA! Retrograde Feb 2020 #44
Punxsutawney Phil!! LOL Scurrilous Feb 2020 #55
There are those who are clapping reaaaalllllyyyy hard tho... ehrnst Feb 2020 #54
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»AT THIS HOUR - DELEGATE E...»Reply #38