Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

JudyM

(29,725 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2020, 12:06 PM Feb 2020

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class [View all]

... In effect, management consulting is a tool that allows corporations to replace lifetime employees with short-term, part-time, and even subcontracted workers, hired under ever more tightly controlled arrangements, who sell particular skills and even specified outputs, and who manage nothing at all.

... the managerial control stripped from middle managers and production workers has been concentrated in a narrow cadre of executives who monopolize planning and coordination. Mid-century, democratic management empowered ordinary workers and disempowered elite executives, so that a bad CEO could do little to harm a company and a good one little to help it. Today, top executives boast immense powers of command—and, as a result, capture virtually all of management’s economic returns. Whereas at mid-century a typical large-company CEO made 20 times a production worker’s income, today’s CEOs make nearly 300 times as much.


Management consultants insist that meritocracy required the restructuring that they encouraged... Consultants seek, in this way, to legitimate both the job cuts and the explosion of elite pay. Properly understood, the corporate reorganizations were, then, not merely technocratic but ideological. Rather than simply improving management, to make American corporations lean and fit, they fostered hierarchy, making management, in David Gordon’s memorable phrase, “fat and mean.”
...
When restructurings eradicated workplace training and purged the middle rungs of the corporate ladder, they also forced companies to look beyond their walls for managerial talent—to elite colleges, business schools, and (of course) to management-consulting firms. That is to say: The administrative techniques that management consultants invented created a huge demand for precisely the services that the consultants supply.
...

A deeper objection to Buttigieg’s association with McKinsey concerns not whom the firm represents but the central role the consulting revolution has played in fueling the enormous economic inequalities that now threaten to turn the United States into a caste society.


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/

————————
Posting this not a criticism of Pete, since his choosing McKinsey doesn’t fully define him, but as an interesting angle to think about as we consider the larger issues of repairing society that the next POTUS will face. Which candidate(s) has the insight to tackle this sociological, structural problem? We can’t pretend it doesn’t exist.

My first priority is beating trump like a rug and rolling back everything we can of his monstrous reign. My second priorities are climate and corruption. But we’d be wise to focus also on the importance of fixing these large structural issues that have daily meaning in the lives of masses of voters.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They helped create the gig economy. Downsize and outsource. jalan48 Feb 2020 #1
+1 alwaysinasnit Feb 2020 #26
The overabundant labor supply helped a lot. empedocles Feb 2020 #2
Buttigieg is the most corporate-friendly and elite-friendly candidate. dalton99a Feb 2020 #3
How so? crimycarny Feb 2020 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2020 #4
Recommended for the analysis and visibility. guillaumeb Feb 2020 #5
Look at the chart. What years was the CEO:worker ratio lowest? Recursion Feb 2020 #15
Exactly, and that era corresponds to a time when 35% of US workers were unionized. guillaumeb Feb 2020 #18
No, I meant 2008-2009 Recursion Feb 2020 #23
I missed that. eom guillaumeb Feb 2020 #24
Well, that's not when it was lowest PETRUS Feb 2020 #25
Hell yes DBoon Feb 2020 #28
Pete Buttigieg hires former Goldman Sachs executive as national policy director floppyboo Feb 2020 #6
Well that resolves that question. JudyM Feb 2020 #29
not really, it is a false-framed hit job attempt Celerity Feb 2020 #31
Ok, that's good info. JudyM Feb 2020 #32
Sonal Shah was Obama's Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation Celerity Feb 2020 #30
From 2008-2009 (at McKinsey) he worked with non-profits to try to combat climate change crimycarny Feb 2020 #7
I'd love to hear him talk about that. JudyM Feb 2020 #13
Agree crimycarny Feb 2020 #17
The ratio went up when real incomes were going up Recursion Feb 2020 #8
220 times the typical worker salary is not the economy doing something right, no. JudyM Feb 2020 #11
Again: it was lower during the recession. Were those times better? Recursion Feb 2020 #14
We're doing this again? Yay!! Scurrilous Feb 2020 #9
You seem not to have read the post. JudyM Feb 2020 #12
So it was management consultants and executives, not those foreigners stealing our jobs? IronLionZion Feb 2020 #10
It went up 50% in the 60s/70s & unchanged in the last 2 decades mathematic Feb 2020 #19
It skyrocketed through the 90's JudyM Feb 2020 #20
It's probably a bunch of things mathematic Feb 2020 #22
"Consult" "Con" + "Insult" EOM The Mouth Feb 2020 #21
can we get this to the greatest page for the posters commentary alone? Kurt V. Feb 2020 #27
That's very kind, thanks Kurt! JudyM Feb 2020 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»How McKinsey Destroyed th...»Reply #0