Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!

Democratic Primaries

In reply to the discussion: Crossing off Pete [View all]
 

Celerity

(55,225 posts)
65. the overall reaction from the media shows this to be a poor take, and I really have to laugh
Thu Feb 20, 2020, 07:38 AM
Feb 2020

at Sanders supporters now magically crossing Pete off some list, when the Sanders campaign's surrogates and actual core like Sirota and Turner and Bri and then the social media supporters and hard left sites (the despicable Clinton hating Nathan J. Robinson's Current Affairs rag and the actual socialist and Democratic Party-hating Jacobin for example) and channels (TYT anyone?) have been slurring and slandering him and Biden and Warren for well nigh a full year now.

Examples you say?

This following article backs up what I have been saying since spring 2019. The whole Sirota/JD/TYT/DSA/BoBer crowd has been camping down in South Bend for 12 months or so, trying to dig up dirt and smear Pete. Other examples are the bogus 'Zuckerberg is running Buttigieg's campaign' bollocks (that Zephyr Teachout, for an example of an official Sanders surrogate doing this shite, had to retract this rot) and tosh like the misquote from the LA Times reporter about Pete and Obama that is still being pawned off as an actual thing by the usual suspects in the far left social media, and the homophobic (raging in the 2nd one's case) South Bend councilmen Oliver Davis and Henry Davis Jr. (no relation) who have been smearing Pete for years and are welcomed with full bro-vado in certain circles in the social media sewers and by some far left channels.



'Racist' TYT reporter continues smear campaign against Buttigieg

October 25, 2019

https://orderofthecoif.wordpress.com/2019/10/25/racist-tyt-reporter-continues-smear-campaign-against-buttigieg/

The Young Turks today published the latest in a series of articles about Pete Buttigieg that they’ve characterised as “investigative reporting”. As will be shown in this article, these articles by Jonathan Larsen constitute nothing less than a sustained smear campaign that breaks all the basic rules of good, objective journalism. Mr Larsen consistently relies upon anonymous sources with suspect motivations, and often misleads his readers about the nature of documents on which he purports to rely.

The articles have also consistently pressed the most slanted and unfavourable interpretation against Mr Buttigieg, and relied substantially on innuendo and conspiracy theory dressed up as searching questions. The articles have sought to create an impression that Mr Buttigieg is engaging in racist policies or corrupt conduct, while failing to establish corroborated facts that actually support such an interpretation. This article will also set out Mr Larsen has questions to answer about his own conduct, which has been alleged in open court to include racist bullying, harassment and racial discrimination. Cenk Uygur should explain why a reporter credibly accused of racist conduct is allowed to continue on his staff while the issue remains unresolved.

Secret Tapes

The matter begins in January 2012 when Mr Buttigieg commenced his first term as Mayor of South Bend. Upon taking up a mayoralty, an Indiana mayor will determine who their chief of police shall be. The incumbent is not guaranteed to be appointed to continue under the new mayor. The incumbent chief in South Bend was Chief Darryl Boykins, an African-American police officer who enjoyed the confidence and respect of the community. Mr Buttigieg interviewed three candidates from the South Bend Police Department; Chief Boykins and division chiefs Steve Richmond and Tim Corbett. Mayor Buttigieg decided, based on his performance as chief and his good relations with the community, to reappoint Chief Boykins.

It has been alleged that six days after Mayor Buttigieg took office, on 6th January, 2012, Chief Boykins called division chief Richmond into his office and, “berated him for having been disloyal to him by seeking his job and for being a ‘backstabber'”. Chief Boykins also told Richmond that he had been wiretapping his and other senior officers phone lines, and that “he would fire anyone he determined to be disloyal”. It is also said that on 17th January, Richmond spoke to Karen DePaepe, SBPD Director of Communications, and asked her whether it was true that his line had been tapped. DePaepe responded that the chief requested a line tap “the day he promoted you to division chief”.

Richmond and other officers whose phone lines it transpired had been tapped by DePaepe at the request of the chief since 2010, went to the US Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana, a Democrat Mr David Capp (who was incidentally later fired by Donald Trump), to complain about the taps which they interpreted to be illegal breaches of their constitutional 4th amendment rights. The FBI commenced an investigation of Chief Boykins, and Mayor Buttigieg was informed. Prior to this the mayor was unaware of the existence of the tapes. The US Attorney informed the mayor that if Chief Boykins was quietly dispensed with as head of the SBPD, they would agree not to press charges.

snip

a lot more at the link, all documented

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Crossing off Pete [View all] squirecam Feb 2020 OP
Agreed. HerbChestnut Feb 2020 #1
Agree totally. apcalc Feb 2020 #2
Agree completely. I don't think he's seasoned enough for 2020. Hoyt Feb 2020 #3
I never have thought he was ready. Big Blue Marble Feb 2020 #13
I was disappointed at the President of Mexico crap. TomSlick Feb 2020 #4
Mayor Pete came across petty with that Mexico crap riversedge Feb 2020 #52
I lost the respect that I had for him. Big Blue Marble Feb 2020 #5
Totally agree nt Raine Feb 2020 #6
He didn't act perfect dsc Feb 2020 #7
Just so. Laelth Feb 2020 #49
Amy was caught off guard by Pete and it put her in such a defensive mood she couldn't respond. Prosper Feb 2020 #62
I suspect you are right. n/t Laelth Feb 2020 #68
Definitely melman Feb 2020 #8
He's Amy's VP running mate. Frasier Balzov Feb 2020 #9
No. At least, not yet. Not a heart beat away.. not ready for prime time question everything Feb 2020 #26
He's too smart and articulate not to grab him now. Frasier Balzov Feb 2020 #39
Amy wouldn't even look at Pete after the debate. Laelth Feb 2020 #50
So she is human and shows emotion. As opposed to being a robot? question everything Feb 2020 #58
I don't think its a good look for any of the candidates tonight going after each other so harshly. Capt. America Feb 2020 #10
I didn't care for the attacks GanjaGrower Feb 2020 #11
I bet most of have run across a "Peter" in or school days or career... VarryOn Feb 2020 #12
If Amy can't handle Pete, she can't handle Trump Generic Brad Feb 2020 #14
If she isn't interrupted squirecam Feb 2020 #17
And Trump would be polite? Generic Brad Feb 2020 #22
More than Pete is. squirecam Feb 2020 #23
Define "handle." Sparkly Feb 2020 #28
Amen, Sparkly! n/t TreadSoftly Feb 2020 #45
Totally agree Lulu KC Feb 2020 #15
I agree. The way he went after Amy was low. DanTex Feb 2020 #16
She got unnerved when anyone went after her Cosmocat Feb 2020 #43
I crossed off Amy. Nt USALiberal Feb 2020 #18
Same Democrats Ascendant Feb 2020 #21
tit for tat? how appropriate question everything Feb 2020 #29
Yeah this was a terrible night for her AngelicaHora Feb 2020 #34
I Agree davs797 Feb 2020 #19
Well.... Bloomberg and Bernie *ARE* polarizing. CalFione Feb 2020 #20
I don't know why everyone is so down on Buttigieg. W_HAMILTON Feb 2020 #24
She was raging? squirecam Feb 2020 #27
Yes, I would say that was raging, especially given that she normally projects... W_HAMILTON Feb 2020 #36
That was a "rage?" Sparkly Feb 2020 #33
What double standard? W_HAMILTON Feb 2020 #41
So because she's from MN she has to present as a Stepford wife 24/7? 2naSalit Feb 2020 #51
"Wife" being the key word here. cwydro Feb 2020 #64
Totally agree frazzled Feb 2020 #35
She didn't go into "a rage " Raine Feb 2020 #38
It's subjective, but she most certainly lost her cool... W_HAMILTON Feb 2020 #42
A small town mayor who can just look at specific facts, vs. a seasoned, responsible senator question everything Feb 2020 #25
If this Beto supporter can get over it you can too nt liskddksil Feb 2020 #30
He came off as quarrelsome Raine Feb 2020 #31
This thread is ridiculous. madaboutharry Feb 2020 #32
He was #3 on my list after recent drop-outs from the race. Sparkly Feb 2020 #37
+1 SunSeeker Feb 2020 #53
+100000000 Celerity Feb 2020 #66
I didn't hear about sexism by moderators that Warren called out. krissey Feb 2020 #40
Funny how we all see things differently. I thought he was a pushover in the last debate unitedwethrive Feb 2020 #44
It was a debate Cosmocat Feb 2020 #46
Agree. Joinfortmill Feb 2020 #47
I disagree with the part about "acting like he was perfect" ecstatic Feb 2020 #48
I thought Pete did great. musicblind Feb 2020 #54
+1 SunSeeker Feb 2020 #60
The problem with these threads.... RhodeIslandOne Feb 2020 #55
You're right, and I like both Amy and Pete. musicblind Feb 2020 #57
Yup DarthDem Feb 2020 #56
After tonight, I'm crossing off Amy. SunSeeker Feb 2020 #59
Not Mayor Pete ForEverGlades Feb 2020 #61
i did not like the fighting between Pete MFM008 Feb 2020 #63
the overall reaction from the media shows this to be a poor take, and I really have to laugh Celerity Feb 2020 #65
Thank you for the post. madaboutharry Feb 2020 #67
I agree. Despite the smile, he was rude. Duppers Feb 2020 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Crossing off Pete»Reply #65