Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: And this is how you destroy a party [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)78. You mean giving the nomination to someone with fewer pledged delegates would be
un-democratic?
What would you call a candidate who asks superdelegates to do that, even if another candidate has a very clear, wide lead over them?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not how it's "supposed to work," it's what the party leaders insisted on, at the expense of
JudyM
Feb 2020
#7
Sanders was involved in the rule changes. He also supporting using SDs in 2016.
TwilightZone
Feb 2020
#33
Because one is still democratic, originally based on population, and the other is based on clout.
JudyM
Feb 2020
#106
Sanders was involved in the rule changes. He also supported using SDs to help him win in 2016.
TwilightZone
Feb 2020
#37
So a candidate trying to convince superdelegates to overthrow the will of the people...
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#89
Let's hope no candidate who is behind by even one pledged delegate tries to pressure superdelegates
ehrnst
Feb 2020
#91
I don't believe they will do that if he has a majority of delegates. That would be a stupid move.
Autumn
Feb 2020
#8
This was my relevant response "I don't believe they will do that if he has a majority of delegates"
Autumn
Feb 2020
#62
Handing the nomination to someone who hasn't earned it is how you destroy a party...nt
SidDithers
Feb 2020
#10
A Sanders nomination would destroy the party. Down ballot races would be disastrous for Democrats
redstateblues
Feb 2020
#95
That link, of course, has nothing whatsoever to do with Bernie writing the rules...
DanTex
Feb 2020
#40
I didn't say he wrote them. I said he demanded them. And he did so at a time when he
Squinch
Feb 2020
#46
I just gave you a source that says its true. But there is no sense arguing with you.
Squinch
Feb 2020
#65
Sanders did not want superdelegates to vote in first round. That was his demand.
boston bean
Feb 2020
#39
He didn't want supers at all. The DNC took them off the first round as a compromise.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#70
He was involved in writing the rules and readily agreed to them when he chose to run as a Dem.
TwilightZone
Feb 2020
#41
Bernie Sanders wanted a contested convention. The rules were changed to allow contested
Squinch
Feb 2020
#77
Superdelegates were put in place for exactly the situation we find ourselves in. After the
Squinch
Feb 2020
#49
As Warren said last night, Sanders helped write the rules, and everyone agreed to the rules....
George II
Feb 2020
#22
A Sanders nomination would destroy the party. Down ballot races would lose the House. FL is gone
redstateblues
Feb 2020
#99
Letting people who aren't in the Party run for the nomination is absurd.
PubliusEnigma
Feb 2020
#108
Couldn't Bloomberg release his delegates to Biden in that event? Am I not
BusyBeingBest
Feb 2020
#114
When Sanders said 'take on the Dem establishment' this is what he meant.
Aaron Pereira
Feb 2020
#118