Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

(4,249 posts)

7. Calling out the omission of a key conditional phrase

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 04:31 PM

Feb 2019

is not “splitting hairs”. It is actually calling out a blatant lie. I am amazed You equated the two omissions.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No, Bernie Sanders did not say that Trump-Kim meeting is "a very good thing" [View all] Yosemito Feb 2019 OP

It's definitely not praise of Trump. It's more wishful thinking. TCJ70 Feb 2019 #1

Talking always beats fighting RandySF Feb 2019 #2

Noticed this morning, Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #3

And then he provided context Yosemito Feb 2019 #5

Calling out the omission of a key conditional phrase Sinistrous Feb 2019 #7

sounds like non issue to me. i got what he meant. nt msongs Feb 2019 #8

When the "if" is that much of a longshot Blue_Tires Feb 2019 #10