Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Warren and Sanders pounce as Biden enters the race [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)21. Much more informative, less biased article on Politico,
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/12/biden-vs-warren-2020-democratic-primaries-bankruptcy-bill-225728
You know, back in the 1990s when California's real estate bubble collapsed, I started out agreeing mostly with Elizabeth about all the poor people losing their homes.
Of course, right at the beginning I had to admit that it wasn't fair to all the honest lenders (most of them) that the affluent people who owned most of the homes I was appraising then were just dishonorably walking away from their debts. Their equity had disappeared, so they decided to break their contracts to throw further losses onto the banks. Did I say "dishonorable?" So many did this that it shook my liberal faith in basic good nature.
That was nothing to the others!
Of those actually foreclosed on, over 90% of the borrowers severely vandalized their homes before vacating. Tearing out plumbing and electrical usual, peeing and shitting on the floors common, breaking windows, and on and on. I would have flat disbelieved it, known it for a lie -- if I hadn't seen it again and again and again.
It was such a huge, widespread problem that a new appraisal specialty developed to evaluate ruined properties, all paid for by the lenders of course. I hated the work and didn't contract with any of the specialty businesses. Also, the industry for cleaning out severely damaged properties exploded in size, large costs also paid for by the banks. Also restoration of buildings and landscapes, huge costs paid by the banks.
We've seen film of cleanouts on TV, people's belongings just tossed in dumpsters by callous, uncaring minimum-wage workers, and thought, oh, poor things. Rightly for the genuine poor victims of misfortune. But, others also often still owed debt on furniture and appliances as well. That type abandoned not just their belongings but their debt, victimizing all those who mistakenly did business with them.
We had friends who lost their homes, and yes, many decent, hardworking, honorable people who always paid their debts regrettably did when that bubble broke. But even such an idealistic liberal as me was forced to accept that borrowing beyond one's means was behavior most indulged by people who were anything but honorable and responsible. Yes, predatory lending existed in huge numbers, but an appalling portion of their customers turned out to be predatory borrowers as well.
Think all the Trumps who didn't inherit millions.
Also, it's important to note that the kind of people who'd leave a home uninhabitable out of enormous malice didn't just borrow from predatory lenders. People did, as well, who lived at every economic level, typically in mid and upper middle-class neighborhoods, and who borrowed from reputable lenders based on incomes they really did have. It was a personality thing. Trump types.
So. I agree with BOTH Biden and Warren. Sometimes people really do need to be able to put their debts behind them for both their personal good and that of society's, and we should help them for their and society's sake. Most of the time, though, people who can really need to be required to pay their debts --for everyone's sake. Even if we have to take them to court and threaten criminal action to make them do it.
You know, back in the 1990s when California's real estate bubble collapsed, I started out agreeing mostly with Elizabeth about all the poor people losing their homes.
Of course, right at the beginning I had to admit that it wasn't fair to all the honest lenders (most of them) that the affluent people who owned most of the homes I was appraising then were just dishonorably walking away from their debts. Their equity had disappeared, so they decided to break their contracts to throw further losses onto the banks. Did I say "dishonorable?" So many did this that it shook my liberal faith in basic good nature.
That was nothing to the others!
Of those actually foreclosed on, over 90% of the borrowers severely vandalized their homes before vacating. Tearing out plumbing and electrical usual, peeing and shitting on the floors common, breaking windows, and on and on. I would have flat disbelieved it, known it for a lie -- if I hadn't seen it again and again and again.
It was such a huge, widespread problem that a new appraisal specialty developed to evaluate ruined properties, all paid for by the lenders of course. I hated the work and didn't contract with any of the specialty businesses. Also, the industry for cleaning out severely damaged properties exploded in size, large costs also paid for by the banks. Also restoration of buildings and landscapes, huge costs paid by the banks.
We've seen film of cleanouts on TV, people's belongings just tossed in dumpsters by callous, uncaring minimum-wage workers, and thought, oh, poor things. Rightly for the genuine poor victims of misfortune. But, others also often still owed debt on furniture and appliances as well. That type abandoned not just their belongings but their debt, victimizing all those who mistakenly did business with them.
We had friends who lost their homes, and yes, many decent, hardworking, honorable people who always paid their debts regrettably did when that bubble broke. But even such an idealistic liberal as me was forced to accept that borrowing beyond one's means was behavior most indulged by people who were anything but honorable and responsible. Yes, predatory lending existed in huge numbers, but an appalling portion of their customers turned out to be predatory borrowers as well.
Think all the Trumps who didn't inherit millions.
Also, it's important to note that the kind of people who'd leave a home uninhabitable out of enormous malice didn't just borrow from predatory lenders. People did, as well, who lived at every economic level, typically in mid and upper middle-class neighborhoods, and who borrowed from reputable lenders based on incomes they really did have. It was a personality thing. Trump types.
So. I agree with BOTH Biden and Warren. Sometimes people really do need to be able to put their debts behind them for both their personal good and that of society's, and we should help them for their and society's sake. Most of the time, though, people who can really need to be required to pay their debts --for everyone's sake. Even if we have to take them to court and threaten criminal action to make them do it.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth sure does... again, she speaks the truth! Would love her & Bernie on the Democratic ticket
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2019
#17
Oh well you need to look around a little better. I just posted in the Biden don't do weed thread
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#74
Never said that. I'm a supporter, not a follower. Big difference. I'll bet Bernie could say he'd
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#70
If that's pouncing, okay, then we need a "pouncer" like Elizabeth... she's AWESOME!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2019
#19
Obama didn't win North or South Carolina or Georgia or a majority of southern states in 2012.
liberalnarb
Apr 2019
#45
It's the content of the email, not just the subject line - it attacked Biden.
George II
Apr 2019
#28
The issue is he's running as a Democrat, yet he takes shots at the Democratic Party....
George II
Apr 2019
#60
So much this and then has the audacity to state that the Democrats must band together to beat trump
tymorial
Apr 2019
#77
It's funny how the first to pounce are the candidates who are newest to the Dem party. nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#5
Joe Biden won't be shy about that. He's welcoming money from Republican donors as well.
Demit
Apr 2019
#12
So? ANY candidate will need the support and votes of republicans to be elected president.
George II
Apr 2019
#57
Remember, NO single person can contribute more than $2800/yr. To many of us that's a "big money"...
George II
Apr 2019
#48
I'll bet they are higher up on your list...since you're starting at the bottom.
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#73
If she didnt then why wouldn't she simply say that in that Daily Beast interview?
honest.abe
Apr 2019
#55
in terms of POTUS the only Repug she voted for was Ford, but liked Carter, voted for him in 1980
Celerity
Apr 2019
#68
you keep pushing that old 2011 article, my links are to a more detailed one that is 7 years newer
Celerity
Apr 2019
#78
here, once again, is the link and a snapshot of the post I replied TO YOU that contained it
Celerity
Apr 2019
#81
Its simply odd she refused to confirm whom she voted for back then in that interview.
honest.abe
Apr 2019
#84
also, Warren didnt register as a Republican until 1991, and almost never voted for a Repub POTUS
Celerity
Apr 2019
#36
I have sent it to you multiple times, and also posted a large excerpt explaining just that
Celerity
Apr 2019
#82
Nope. I did a text search of the articles you sent and nothing regarding 1984 vote.
honest.abe
Apr 2019
#83
I've been through bankruptcy once, and it looms large yet again. I like Joe,
GreenPartyVoter
Apr 2019
#14