Arizona Roadrunner
Arizona Roadrunner's JournalWhy aren't Democrats pointing out Trump's position on Social Security?
Sometimes you wonder if the Democratic Party is ready for "Prime Time". They now have a chance to go after the "negotiations" between Trump and Ryan on such things as Social Security and we hear nothing from the Dems. Could it be that the New Democrats are so tied to Wall Street and their interests in privatizing Social Security and turning Medicare into a voucher program, that they can't speak for fear of losing funding from their benefactors?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-supports-cutting-social-security-report-says_us_5749db63e4b0dacf7ad515e4
Pay to Play Clinton's--Follow the money laundering
This is how the Clinton's define "the public interest". And some Democrats wonder why so many people may not vote at all in the Presidential election. Frankly, there may be a chance that the Libertarian party may get more votes than the Republicans and the Democrats which throws the contest into the House of Representatives since no one will have more than 270 votes in the Electoral College. And some people wonder why Sanders shouldn't keep running in the primaries.
http://nypost.com/2016/05/22/how-corporate-america-bought-hillary-clinton-for-21m/
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
Pay to play Clinton's--Follow the money laundering
This is how the Clinton's define "the public interest". And Democrats wonder why so many people may not vote at all in the Presidential election. Frankly, there may be a chance that the Libertarian party may get more votes than the Republicans and the Democrats which throws the contest into the House of Representatives since no one will have more than 270 votes in the Electoral College. And some people wonder why Sanders shouldn't keep running.
http://nypost.com/2016/05/22/how-corporate-america-bought-hillary-clinton-for-21m/
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
A BB gun is a weapon!
Recently heard about a kid getting shot by police who was carrying a BB gun that looked like "a real gun". His parents apparently equated a BB gun with a toy gun. Sorry folks but a BB gun is a "real gun" with limited capabilities but it can still kill and or injure someone if they are hit with a BB in the right places. It is not a toy gun!!!!
Why are parents letting their kids out of the house with a BB gun? They frankly are responsible for this kid getting shot by a police officer. Yes police officers need to be well trained and better trained regarding when and how to use their lethal weapons. But when you have "toy guns" and especially BB guns that look just like regular pistols, there are real issues involved.
Humvee or speech from Clinton for 225000? Which one for you?
Just saw that in Germany three Humvees broke loose from parachutes in a "routine" exercise. They cost 220,000 each. Got me to thinking would I rather attend a speech by Hillary costing 225,000 or get a Humvee? Guess which one I chose........
Hillary: Gives new meaning to conflicts of interest and the "general public interest"
By the way, I wonder if any of the speeches was about the "general public interest" as opposed to a vested interest's concerns?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/firms-with-government-interests-paid-clinton-speeches
Aiding and abetting potentially indicted people
All of the Clinton supporters who are worried about Sanders continuing his campaign should be more worried that he won't be around if and when Bill and/or Hillary Clinton are charged with criminal charges as a result of decisions being made relative to when and how speeches were paid for and/or when and how contributions were made to the Clinton Foundation. Here is one of several apparent situations of interest.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
Therefore, they should be worried about are these supporters giving aid and comfort to potential criminals. Will they have as part of their resume that they gave aid and comfort to potential criminals? That is much more potentially serious than being worried about Sanders quitting the "race" sooner so the "supporters" don't have to worry about negative comments. If they can't handle negative judgments during a primary, how are they going to handle it during the general election where Trump is already calling Clinton "crooked Hillary"?
Bernie better hang around......
There are not only current potential indictments that we know about but there may be some we don't know about. There may be a transaction by transaction investigations of her's and Bill's speeches, their "foundation" and ties to decisions made while she was Secretary of State such as the Swiss bank UBS situation.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
The bottom line is there are too many risks for her getting elected let alone being allowed to govern due in large part to her's and Bill's actions. Is it true they registered corporations in Delaware? If they did, the only reason one does that unless they live in Delaware is to evade and/or avoid something.
Why It Matters Article on Hillary Speeches at Goldman-Sachs
Why Hillary Clinton's Goldman-Sachs speeches matter.
http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/04/12/hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-why-it-matters/
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Jul 23, 2013, 09:33 PMNumber of posts: 168
