Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grins

Grins's Journal
Grins's Journal
January 28, 2026

Ghislaine Maxwell's petition to the Court

The Daily Beast wrote yesterday (27 Jan 2026) that Ghislaine Maxwell "detonated a political time bomb from behind bars," in her habeas petition, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant, filed 17 December 2025.

Daily Beast:

"Maxwell dropped a bombshell claim that four potential "co-conspirators" and "25 men" scored "secret settlements" tied to Epstein's abuse - without facing any indictment."

"Four co-conspirators: and "25 Men." That surprised me. So I found and read much of her habeas petition. First thought: "She wrote this herself? Pro se? Not her lawyer? (She has one. Who is also a friend of Deputy U.S. Attorney, Todd Blanche.) If she did write this, she wrote a very impressive petition.

Some snips:

Page 1
A defendant moving to dismiss for selective prosecution bears the heavy burden of establishing at least prima facie 1) that, while others similarly situated have not generally been proceeded against because of conduct of the type forming the basis of the charge against him, he has been signaled out for prosecution and 2) that the governments discriminatory selection of him for prosecution has been invidious or in bad faith. The first of these "requires a showing that similarly situated individuals of a different classification were not prosecuted'. None of the 4 named co-conspirators or the 25 men with secret settlements were indicted.

That's her, "But...but...but whadabout them?" argument.

Page 1
There were 4 employee co-conspirators that were not indicted but named in Non-Prosecution Agreement EXHIBIT 81 and referenced in the Indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. The Petitioner was not. New evidence reveals that there were 25 men with which the plaintiff lawyers reached secret settlements - that could equally be considered as co-conspirators. None of these men have been prosecuted and none has been revealed to Petitioner; she would have called them as witnesses had she known.

Page 2
The intervening years were used to exploit the civil litigation process to gain a tactical advantage using plaintiffs' lawyers in the front and behind the scenes to defame Petitioner in pleadings working the media promoting "fake news" falsely portraying her and Epstein as one person whilst working to invalidate/overturn the Non-Prosecution Agreement using the Crime Victims' Rights Act as litigated in POINTS THREE and FOUR set forth above. Bradley Edwards Esq. acted as the proxy for Assistant United States Attorney (Ann Marie) Villafana both conspiring to overturn the Non-Prosecution Agreement thru the Crime Victims' Rights Act litigation. Obtaining police records and victims' names from law enforcement and USAO Florida Assistant United States Attorney, Villafana sharing information with potential claimants, using the information for "secret" settlements with men with deep pockets in exchange for keeping the identity of those men out of the public arena to benefit the personal pocketbooks of plaintiff's lawyers. In 2008 Assistant United States Attorney Villafana directed Bradley Edwards Esq. to file the Crime Victims' Rights Act case, its sole aim to overturn the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The Crime Victims' Rights Act became a tactical tool that allowed the Government to keep investigating Epstein and the co-conspirators through civil litigation and discovery. The ongoing litigation allowed continued press collusion to push a false narrative through friendly journalists like Sharon Churcher and JKB turning Petitioner into an object of 'rage bait.'

Page 6
11. (Leslie) Wexner was accused of participating and witnessing abuse, no settlement with Wexner was revealed EXHIBIT 21. Press reports reveal other potential men including Leon Black who agreed to pay $62.5 Million to Settle Epstein Related Claims and the others that the Plaintiff's Lawyers negotiated (per the press reports). Similarly, no discovery on Leon Black was provided to Petitioner. The New York Times 7/21/2023 (EXHIBIT 32).

She claims there were 29 others the DoJ could have prosecuted and did not. Of those 29 she only mentioned Wexner and Black. No others.

What's missing from the petition? "I didn't do it."

Notes. Mentioned in her petition:
- Bradley Edwards Esq., a Florida attorney who represents over 50 victims of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein.
- Sharon Churcher is a former London Daily Mail journalist. Chrucher interviewed Virginia Giuffre who accused Prince Andrew of abusing her as a teenager in 2011.
- "JKB" refers to Miami Herald journalist Julie K. Brown; credited with re-opening the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse case with a series of reports starting in November 2018.
January 27, 2026

With all the vile fuckery aimed at Canada by the treasonous orange gasbag, REMEMBER THIS...

27 January 2026

On this date in 1980, six American diplomats who had taken refuge in the the Canadian Embassy in Tehran during the Iran hostage crisis, were successfully smuggled out of Iran.

All at great peril to their lives, Canadian Ambassador Ken Taylor and his staff hid the Americans for nearly three months before arranging their escape on January 27–28, 1980, using fake Canadian passports to fly them out disguised as a film crew.

If you Google "Thank You Canada", and click on images, you will see the appreciation from Americans for that bravery. From everyday Americans, from President Carter, and later - Ronald Reagan.

For myself, I was at a fancy restaurant in Washington, DC a day or two after the news was leaked to the public. Six Canadians were also, by chance, in the restaurant. When one of the guests at the restaurant heard there was a table of Canadians, he told them their money was no good, their night was on him. Other restaurant guests cheered and sent bottles of champagne to the Canadian's table.

And then MAGA REPUBLICANS elected a seething clinical-narcissist, a black hole of despair, deceit, and wretched debauchery.

All that good will and friendship - Gone! What have we become?

January 25, 2026

25-Years ago today; 25 January 2001. Remember this?

While fighting two wars that he won, fighting off a hostile Republican Congress that desperately wanted to impeach him, Bill Clinton still managed an economy that brought annual surpluses to the national economy. For the first time in decades the deficit was in minus territory and the debt going down - because Clinton ordered the surplus be applied to the debt.

On the FOURTH DAY of our "MBA president's" first term, this fucking guy no less:

"The time has come, in my judgment, to consider a budgetary strategy that is consistent with a preemptive smoothing of the glide path to zero federal debt or, more realistically, to the level of federal debt that is an effective irreducible minimum.'' - Alan Greenspan, in Senate testimony, Jan. 25, 2001.

Translation: Go ahead and cut taxes. Surpluses are bad! Endless surpluses were an economic danger to the nation's very survival!

Greenspan and the GOP said we needed to prevent the horror of having too much fucking money! Cuz' next thing you know, the government would have zero fucking debt and we'd be socking away all that extra money by buying private sector financial assets - "Soshilism!!!" And besides, those damn big-government liberals will just blow the money on new government programs, like education, hunger, health care, housing, etc.

But, no. THE FIRST legislation proposed by the Bush II administration was this bill to cut taxes.

Projections by Republicans and the Bush administration then saw of surpluses of $5.6 trillion over 10 years. Within MONTHS that outlook in 2001 quickly turned into estimated deficits of at least $1.4 trillion and possibly as much as $5 trillion.

Isn't that adorable??? $5-Trillion! Remind me what the deficits were during the Bush II administration. And what they aretoday...
October 22, 2025

A quick history on Trump demolishing the White House...Why should anyone be surpriosed?

Yesterday the Washington Post ran a story on the destruction of the East Wing of White House, writing that the treasonous, orange bloated gasbag, said the construction wouldn’t ‘interfere’ with the existing White House structure. And moved on.

There was massive "interference" with the White House. This should not have been unexpected. Some quick history.

The venerable Bonwit Teller department store closed its store at Fifth and 56th in 1979. The building was bought by Trump to be demolished so he could build his hideous "Trump Tower." The Bonwit Teller building had an artistic elegant facade that featured a spectacular 15-foot-high Art Deco sculptural ensemble. It was a treasured landmark in New York! (Google and find the image.)

Like the destruction of the White House, Trump assured NYC that the valuable art deco-style bas-reliefs, as well as the fence located above the entrance to the store, would be donated to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. The museum was eager to have it and put it on display.

New York Times, June 6, 1980:

Two stone bas-relief sculptures high on the facade of the Bonwit Teller Building under demolition on Fifth Avenue, pieces that had been sought with enthusiasm by the Metropolitan Museum of Art were smashed by jackhammers yesterday on the orders of a real estate developer.

That "real estate developer" said "the merit of these stones was not great enough to justify the effort to save them.” That three independent appraisals (that he never identified) found them to be "without artistic merit” and worth less than $9,000 in “resale value.”

Which is odd because the Metropolitan Museum of Art had estimated its value at 22-times that at $200,000.

That "real estate developer" quickly became known in NY as “That fucking bastard.”
He was - who else? - Donald Trump.

Below, a snip of that NY Times story in 1980. Anything jump out at you...? (Hint: Last sentence.)



Yes; THAT "John Baron." To complete that sentence:

"But John Baron, a vice president of the Trump Organization, said after the demolition yesterday ...”

Five months later on 17 November, Trump would boast about smashing the art deco-style bas-reliefs pieces. He remarked that the gilt (because of course) lion’s head medallions at the Grand Hyatt's ballroom entrance were: “real art, not like the junk I destroyed at the Bonwit Teller.”

And seated nearby - Roy Cohn.
October 10, 2025

Today's quote of the day! History can be a bitch! (You should save this.)

"If Joe Biden federalizes the National Guard, that would be a direct attack on states' rights. Over the last several years, we've seen Democrats try to take away our Freedoms of religion, assembly, and speech. We can't let them take away our right to defend ourselves, too." - Kristi Noem, her account on X, 06 Feb 2024.
September 26, 2025

Quick questions on the Comey indictment...

From the news: The basis of the grand jury charging Comey was the 2020 hearing on the FBI’s probe into links between Trump and Russia during the 2016 campaign. The grand jury charged Comey on two counts:

- Making false statements to Congress, and
- Obstruction of a congressional proceeding,

A third count of lying to Congress was rejected by jurors.

Questions:

#1: Did Congress file charges against Comey? Isn't that the first step in any crime? Someone has to file a complaint? No complaint, no injury?

#2: If the third count of lying to Congress was rejected, then how can Comey be indicted for "Making false statements?"

#3: If the hearing was about the 2016 campaign and Russia, can the full (Bill Barr 100% unredacted) Mueller Report be brought into evidence?

September 23, 2025

Trump goes after Judge's WIFE. (Another) new low.

Press Release
U.S. Department of the Treasury
=======================================

Sept. 22, 2025

WASHINGTON — Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is sanctioning the Lex Instituto de Estudos Juridicos LTDA (Lex Institute) for its support to Brazilian Supreme Federal Court justice, Alexandre de Moraes. De Moraes was designated by Office of Foreign Assets Control on July 30, 2025, for using his position to authorize arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppress freedom of expression in Brazil.

Here it comes!

Also designated today is Viviane Barci de Moraes, de Moraes’ WIFE, who serves as the head of the Lex Institute.

Alexandre de Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions, and politicized prosecutions—including against former President Jair Bolsonaro. Today’s action makes clear that Treasury will continue to target individuals who provide material support to de Moraes as he abuses human rights.” - Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent.

Today’s action is being taken pursuant to Executive Order 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse around the world.


Link: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0257
=======================================

"...de Moraes is responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions,...politicized prosecutions -including against (a) former President." - Treasury Sec. Bessent.

Read that sentence again, but substitute "Trump" for "de Moraes," and then see how it reads. Tell me how that does not also scream "TRUMP!!!"
September 16, 2025

Terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione dismissed

BBC:

A judge in New York state has dismissed two terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione, the alleged killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Although prosecutors argued that writings left by Mangione demonstrated a terrorism motive, the judge said they failed to show that the suspect intended to put political pressure on the government or terrorise the general population – key provisions of New York’s terrorism law which was passed in the wake of the 11 September 2001 attacks.
September 11, 2025

In case you missed it and need a laugh - Jared Moskowitz on the "fake" Trump signature in Epstein's birthday book

In case you missed it and need a laugh, this is Jared Moskowitz nailing "Gym" Jordan and James Comer, aka, "Comer Fudd", over the Reich's bull-squat argument that it was not Trump's signature on the Epstein birthday book.

I transcribed it from the video, so any errors are all mine, as is the emphasis.
=======================================

10 Sept 2025
C-SPAN

Jared Moskowitz calls on Chairman Jim Jordan to find out who "forged" Trump’s signature on the Epstein birthday card 22 years ago.

I am here to defend him as, by far, the best investigator of all time in the Capitol, which is exactly why ALL OF HIS INVESTIGATIONS, which have used, you know, Chinese informants that were prosecuted, and Russian disinformation, people from prison. I mean, the main thing he was tasked with last year, right, which was the Biden impeachment, that - we had a vote...! Oh, no. We never had a vote on that cuz', of course - he didn't find any evidence.

So this morning our close personal friend, Mr. Comer, said that he was not going to look into the letter, or the doodle, uhhh the president's doodle - he's a decent doodler, by the way - so he wasn't going to look into whether the signature was a forgery, and I'm concerned about that.

Because this is the president of the United States. If there are forgeries or forgers out there, I think we should investigate it.

In fact, this document is 22-years old! So you are telling me that someone - 22-years ago - went 'Back to the Future' and forged his signature - when he was a Democrat, and somehow this person was Nostradamus, KNEW he would become a Republican, become president 22-years later.

So listen. I submit to you that we can solve this problem for the American people. You don't have take my word for it, you don't have to take our dear personal friend, Mr. Comer's, word for it - let's bring in a signature expert!

You guys pick the witnesses, bring in your signature experts, swear them under oath, and let's have this signature examined. Is it his; or it is not his.

We don't have to play games or...you know, the president says it's not his; we say it is him. No! No! No! Let's bring in a signature expert, a referee because we can't agree on anything, even when it is right in front of our face.

Missing: the laughter from the Rep. sitting next to him!

August 14, 2025

Why is it the Reich-wing went all barking-mad over George Soros, but...

Why is it that the Reich-wing went all barking-mad over George Soros, but remained silent over Trump's Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, being hired by Soros Fund Management and eventually becoming the head of its London office? And that after Bessent left Soros' employ, Soros made a $2 Billion (yes; with a "B"!) anchor investment in Bessent's new venture?

Asking for several millions of people...

Profile Information

Member since: Fri Aug 29, 2003, 10:25 AM
Number of posts: 9,333
Latest Discussions»Grins's Journal