Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zenlitened

Zenlitened's Journal
Zenlitened's Journal
March 7, 2025

CA Gov Gavin Newsom "Completely Aligns" With Charlie Kirk On Trans Issues In Podcast

Well there you have it: trans lives don’t matter worth a damn to this so-called standard-bearer of the party’s future. This is utterly inexcusable, and no politician — of ANY party — who so eagerly sanctions harm to trans people will ever have my support. What a sickening disgrace.

On Thursday, California Governor Gavin Newsom launched his new podcast, This is Gavin Newsom. His first guest? Notorious anti-LGBTQ+ extremist Charlie Kirk. The episode covered a wide range of grievances Kirk and other far-right activists have with Newsom, touching on topics from Black Lives Matter to COVID policies. However, the issue of transgender rights surfaced repeatedly. At one point, Newsom stated he was "completely aligned" with Kirk on transgender participation in sports. He also appeared to express agreement with restrictions on medical care for incarcerated transgender people and limits on gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth.

The conversation first turned to transgender athletes when Charlie Kirk referenced a transgender athlete in California, stating, "You, as the governor, should step out and say no, no." Newsom responded, "Right… I think it’s an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that. It’s deeply unfair," later adding, "Boy did I see how you guys were able to weaponize that issue." Kirk pushed back, insisting he wasn’t "weaponizing" the issue. Newsom quickly walked back his comment, replying, "You’re right." He then later said that he “agreed” with Charlie Kirk that it was not right transgender athletes should play and that he was “completely aligned” with Charlie Kirk on this issue, blaming a law put in place before he became governor: “It turns out in 2014, years before I was governor, there was a law established that established the legal principles that allow trans athletes in women’s sports. The issue of fairness is completely legit. I completely align with you, we have to acknowledge it.”

The conversation didn’t stop there. Charlie Kirk quickly pivoted to other transgender issues, bringing up Vice President Kamala Harris’ support for incarcerated transgender people. Newsom agreed that the Kamala is for they/them ads were politically damaging, calling them "devastating." When asked about transgender incarcerated people, Newsom responded, "This was even more challenging… because this is issues of people who are incarcerated getting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment… that is a 90/10 [issue]," referring to how he believes such policies poll. He also appeared frustrated that Harris "was in the video and expressed support."

At the close of the podcast, Charlie Kirk shifted the discussion to transgender healthcare, stating, "I encourage you to learn about the butchery that is happening under chemical castration in this state. The American people are overwhelmingly against it." Newsom responded, "Yeah. I think we have to be more sensitized to that."


Source:
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/ca-gov-gavin-newsom-completely-aligns


June 26, 2015

Congratulations and thank you...

...to everyone who has played a role in making marriage equality the law of the land.

Years, decades, whole lifetimes spent ushering in this day. Actions and deeds large and small... all of it mattered. All of it added up and up and up every day, even when it seemed like it didn't.

Even when it seemed like your own peers were at best indifferent, at worst outright hostile.

You kept at it, no matter what, and now the day has finally come. Well done. You did it. You built this!



Celebrate, and savor it, because this is what accomplishment feels like. And hang on to that feeling. It will be a powerful fuel as we recommit ourselves to the work that still needs doing.



June 7, 2015

Hold on, wait. You need to start at the beginning:

What are words? In fact, what are letters? Are they shapes? Or sounds? Sound-shapes?

What are they for? Can anyone really know? I'm just a poor, puzzled misogyn-- um, I mean, obvious tro--- uh, I just so sincerely wish to understand!

/grim sarcasm

Seriously folks, the OP's point couldn't have been simpler or more clear. But in case it actually was too complicated for you somehow, try this:

Don't use that word.

You're welcome.

October 29, 2014

Self-proclaimed ally insists he knows better...

...refuses to concede value in POVs based on lived experience...

...derails discussion with procedural minutia about "how the world really works"...

...projects his faults onto others in the discussion...

...and eventually declares himself the tragically put-upon victim of the very group of people with whom he claims to ally.

Yep, I think we've about covered it all here.

Bye now, I'm through.

Missing entry

May 13, 2014

Good news: You can take a breather and stop worrying.

Because it turns out no one is expecting you to solve all the problems. Heck, you're not expected to solve ANY of them. No one is.

You see, solving big problems is a group project and lots of other people want to pitch in too, some of them neither white nor male. Imagine that!

Sure, it would be great if you wanted to pitch in as well, but that's entirely your choice.

If it all seems too daunting, or if working in big and often unstructured groups is not your thing... well fine. Not a problem.

Other folks are happy to get on with the project, and ask only that you avoid interrupting their work.

March 26, 2012

I'm certain their "objections" are not genuine at all.

I'm certain that this all a tactic they deploy: Phony Outrage.

Newt Gingrich built his whole career on this kind of shit back in the 1990s.

Screeching and squawking, boo hoo hoo-ing over every little thing.

Blowing even the most minor comment massively out of proportion.

Squealing "it's reprehensible!!!" and demanding constant apologies.

The goal: Knock your opponent back on his heels, get him reacting to nonsense instead of pressing his own attack.

Sidetrack the conversation, get people all riled-up and arguing over anything but the hard truths we as a people have to face, the important decisions we need to make.

Gingrich injected this toxic technique into our national discourse decades ago. And he's still at it now.

I'm convinced there's no "why" to this latest criticism of Pres. Obama, because there's no sincerity to it at all.

It's just intended to fuck things up. That's what they do.

March 8, 2012

"...find ways to slow, stop or counter the insidious, right-wing meme machine"

Agreed, this needs to be a top priority.

Should've been for about two decades, now, at least.

I think the first step is for us all, especially those in a position to make themselves heard, to be willing to call a lie a lie.

That goes for the Democrats we elect as leaders, certainly.

No, they can't go spouting off like we do on a message board.

But they need to recognize moments when the studied etiquette of the Senate floor, for example, just doesn't get our message out.

Not when it's up against the kind of deliberate, unrelenting, reality-warping propaganda the rightwing spews daily, exactly as you describe.

February 19, 2012

Yeah, I find that phrase galling. Like, here's a fact:

I'm not a sinner.

And I'd go a step further: There's no such thing as "sin."

Only cruelty, so reflexive and habitual, so casual in its contempt and so satisfied amid the harm it causes, that it rises to the level of Evil.

Real evil.

Which is an entirely human attribute or artifact, no god or gods required.

February 19, 2012

How Not to be Defensive When Accused of Transphobia (A Guide For Cis People)

By Lisa Harney
QuestioningTransphobia.com

3) Take the criticism seriously. Do not dismiss it out of hand, especially if the criticism comes from a trans person. Trans people tend to be more aware of transphobia than most cis people are. This is because transphobic attitudes are often a matter of life and death – the ability to find a job, get housing, not get murdered, that sort of thing. ...

5) Don’t Make It About Your Accuser. ...Don’t tell them they’re trying to silence you – they’re not, they’re trying to tell you how your words and actions hurt them. Don’t tell them they’re driving you away. Don’t make the accusation that “any disagreement with a trans person is labeled as transphobia.” None of these things are true, and trying to claim they are is simply an attempt to stop others from pointing out your transphobic behavior. ...

6) Don’t "Hate the Sin, Not the Sinner." Don’t try to justify your actions by claiming you’re opposed to transgender politics. Just don’t. You’re rationalizing your transphobia and imposing your worldview on trans people, by assigning motives and politics to them that they may not themselves have. ...You’re not dealing with theory, you’re dealing with human beings, and their lives. To you, the question as to whether trans people have valid identities may be a matter of theory. For trans people, it’s a matter of life and death.


Link:
http://www.questioningtransphobia.com/?p=2632

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Hometown: Massachusetts
Home country: USA
Member since: Fri Dec 3, 2004, 01:09 PM
Number of posts: 9,538
Latest Discussions»Zenlitened's Journal