Zenlitened
Zenlitened's JournalCA Gov Gavin Newsom "Completely Aligns" With Charlie Kirk On Trans Issues In Podcast
Well there you have it: trans lives dont matter worth a damn to this so-called standard-bearer of the partys future. This is utterly inexcusable, and no politician of ANY party who so eagerly sanctions harm to trans people will ever have my support. What a sickening disgrace.
The conversation first turned to transgender athletes when Charlie Kirk referenced a transgender athlete in California, stating, "You, as the governor, should step out and say no, no." Newsom responded, "Right I think its an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that. Its deeply unfair," later adding, "Boy did I see how you guys were able to weaponize that issue." Kirk pushed back, insisting he wasnt "weaponizing" the issue. Newsom quickly walked back his comment, replying, "Youre right." He then later said that he agreed with Charlie Kirk that it was not right transgender athletes should play and that he was completely aligned with Charlie Kirk on this issue, blaming a law put in place before he became governor: It turns out in 2014, years before I was governor, there was a law established that established the legal principles that allow trans athletes in womens sports. The issue of fairness is completely legit. I completely align with you, we have to acknowledge it.
The conversation didnt stop there. Charlie Kirk quickly pivoted to other transgender issues, bringing up Vice President Kamala Harris support for incarcerated transgender people. Newsom agreed that the Kamala is for they/them ads were politically damaging, calling them "devastating." When asked about transgender incarcerated people, Newsom responded, "This was even more challenging because this is issues of people who are incarcerated getting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment that is a 90/10 [issue]," referring to how he believes such policies poll. He also appeared frustrated that Harris "was in the video and expressed support."
At the close of the podcast, Charlie Kirk shifted the discussion to transgender healthcare, stating, "I encourage you to learn about the butchery that is happening under chemical castration in this state. The American people are overwhelmingly against it." Newsom responded, "Yeah. I think we have to be more sensitized to that."
Source:
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/ca-gov-gavin-newsom-completely-aligns
Congratulations and thank you...
...to everyone who has played a role in making marriage equality the law of the land.
Years, decades, whole lifetimes spent ushering in this day. Actions and deeds large and small... all of it mattered. All of it added up and up and up every day, even when it seemed like it didn't.
Even when it seemed like your own peers were at best indifferent, at worst outright hostile.
You kept at it, no matter what, and now the day has finally come. Well done. You did it. You built this!
Celebrate, and savor it, because this is what accomplishment feels like. And hang on to that feeling. It will be a powerful fuel as we recommit ourselves to the work that still needs doing.
Hold on, wait. You need to start at the beginning:
What are words? In fact, what are letters? Are they shapes? Or sounds? Sound-shapes?
What are they for? Can anyone really know? I'm just a poor, puzzled misogyn-- um, I mean, obvious tro--- uh, I just so sincerely wish to understand!
/grim sarcasm
Seriously folks, the OP's point couldn't have been simpler or more clear. But in case it actually was too complicated for you somehow, try this:
Don't use that word.
You're welcome.
Self-proclaimed ally insists he knows better...
...refuses to concede value in POVs based on lived experience...
...derails discussion with procedural minutia about "how the world really works"...
...projects his faults onto others in the discussion...
...and eventually declares himself the tragically put-upon victim of the very group of people with whom he claims to ally.
Yep, I think we've about covered it all here.
Bye now, I'm through.
Good news: You can take a breather and stop worrying.
Because it turns out no one is expecting you to solve all the problems. Heck, you're not expected to solve ANY of them. No one is.
You see, solving big problems is a group project and lots of other people want to pitch in too, some of them neither white nor male. Imagine that!
Sure, it would be great if you wanted to pitch in as well, but that's entirely your choice.
If it all seems too daunting, or if working in big and often unstructured groups is not your thing... well fine. Not a problem.
Other folks are happy to get on with the project, and ask only that you avoid interrupting their work.
I'm certain their "objections" are not genuine at all.
I'm certain that this all a tactic they deploy: Phony Outrage.
Newt Gingrich built his whole career on this kind of shit back in the 1990s.
Screeching and squawking, boo hoo hoo-ing over every little thing.
Blowing even the most minor comment massively out of proportion.
Squealing "it's reprehensible!!!" and demanding constant apologies.
The goal: Knock your opponent back on his heels, get him reacting to nonsense instead of pressing his own attack.
Sidetrack the conversation, get people all riled-up and arguing over anything but the hard truths we as a people have to face, the important decisions we need to make.
Gingrich injected this toxic technique into our national discourse decades ago. And he's still at it now.
I'm convinced there's no "why" to this latest criticism of Pres. Obama, because there's no sincerity to it at all.
It's just intended to fuck things up. That's what they do.
"...find ways to slow, stop or counter the insidious, right-wing meme machine"
Agreed, this needs to be a top priority.
Should've been for about two decades, now, at least.
I think the first step is for us all, especially those in a position to make themselves heard, to be willing to call a lie a lie.
That goes for the Democrats we elect as leaders, certainly.
No, they can't go spouting off like we do on a message board.
But they need to recognize moments when the studied etiquette of the Senate floor, for example, just doesn't get our message out.
Not when it's up against the kind of deliberate, unrelenting, reality-warping propaganda the rightwing spews daily, exactly as you describe.
Yeah, I find that phrase galling. Like, here's a fact:
I'm not a sinner.
And I'd go a step further: There's no such thing as "sin."
Only cruelty, so reflexive and habitual, so casual in its contempt and so satisfied amid the harm it causes, that it rises to the level of Evil.
Real evil.
Which is an entirely human attribute or artifact, no god or gods required.
How Not to be Defensive When Accused of Transphobia (A Guide For Cis People)
By Lisa Harney
QuestioningTransphobia.com
5) Dont Make It About Your Accuser. ...Dont tell them theyre trying to silence you theyre not, theyre trying to tell you how your words and actions hurt them. Dont tell them theyre driving you away. Dont make the accusation that any disagreement with a trans person is labeled as transphobia. None of these things are true, and trying to claim they are is simply an attempt to stop others from pointing out your transphobic behavior. ...
6) Dont "Hate the Sin, Not the Sinner." Dont try to justify your actions by claiming youre opposed to transgender politics. Just dont. Youre rationalizing your transphobia and imposing your worldview on trans people, by assigning motives and politics to them that they may not themselves have. ...Youre not dealing with theory, youre dealing with human beings, and their lives. To you, the question as to whether trans people have valid identities may be a matter of theory. For trans people, its a matter of life and death.
Link:
http://www.questioningtransphobia.com/?p=2632
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: Massachusetts
Home country: USA
Member since: Fri Dec 3, 2004, 01:09 PM
Number of posts: 9,538