Not a new article, but its pertinent.
Over the past 150 years, American gun owners have gone from viewing their weapons largely as utilitarian farm tools to weapons that provide both a feeling of physical security and a sense of psychological solace. Guns importance to their owners now goes much deeper than merely being implements of self-defense.
University of WisconsinMadison researcher and assistant professor Nick Buttrick studies the psychological relationship that millions of Americans have with their guns. Buttricks research builds on the historical record to show that in the U.S.the only country with more civilian firearms than peoplewhite Southerners started cultivating the tradition of the home arsenal immediately after the Civil War because of insecurities and racial fears. During the rest of the 19th century, those anxieties metamorphosized into a fetishization of the firearm to the point that, in the present day, gun owners view their weapons as adding meaning and a sense of purpose to their lives.
Buttrick, who gave a talk on his research at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) earlier this month, contends that gun owners see their world as an increasingly tumultuous place and that guns have become a tool for keeping that perceived chaos at bay. Scientific American spoke with Buttrick about the psychological roots of the gun culture that has contributed to the more than 100 mass shootings that have occurred in the U.S. so far this year.
What are the roots of the U.S.s obsession with gun ownership? And when did the motivation for having guns move from largely using them for utilitarian purposes and sport to using them as a tool for protection?
The historical literature shows that in the early American period in the 18th and beginning of the 19th century, we had a different relationship with guns than we do today. A gun was treated as a tool for hunting, pest control and other tasks around the farm. The advertisements of the time painted guns as something that helped you live your life rather than something used for protection. While there was an armed militia to ward off foreign invaders, guns were centrally stored in an armory, not kept individually.
Read more: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-gun-became-integral-to-the-self-identity-of-millions-of-americans/
More at: https://blog.londolozi.com/2023/04/05/my-favourite-moments-with-the-new-lion-cubs-captured/
It seems to me that we are still living in a functioning democracy, with a democratically elected government.
But there are more and more disturbing signs that we are losing our freedoms, and that our institutions do not serve the people who they ought to serve.
I see the word fascism more and more. I'd like to know what DUers think about the current state of democracy in the US.
Snyder is a Yale professor who wrote the book On Tyranny. There are 16 tweets in the full conversation.
What kind of woman joins in an attack on women's rights?
You are despicable.
that everything is going to be ok.
He's so calm, so confident, so measured, so intelligent.
I did not grow up in the age of the internet.
I did not grow up in the age of social media.
In high school one of my teachers spent a whole semester showing us how to do research for a paper. But the topic was nothing so important as getting vaccinated.
We live in an age where there is a huge amount of readily accessible information. But a lot of people don't know how to use it. Just as you can make an argument for just about anything from the Bible, you can find any opinion you want on the internet.
Facebook is not research. You can find any opinion you want on Facebook.
Twitter is not research. You can find any opinion you want on Twitter.
Listening to Joe Rogan is not research.
In this age, people consider all sources of information to be equal. They are not.
This is a second argument that anti-vaxxers commonly make.
As far as I know, all Covid vaccines in the US have been free to anybody that wants one. As far as I know, Anthony Fauci is a salaried employee and his income is not affected by vaccine production.
But people don't trust Big Pharma, in part due to the Oxycontin/Perdue fiasco.
The response to my first thread was great. Can you help me out with responding to this argument too?
Profile InformationMember since: Mon Oct 1, 2012, 04:10 PM
Number of posts: 16,829