For my mom. 6.5 years of living together, most of it in my house. Alzheimers.
She had polio as a child, and that has been a compounding factor more recently. Also, she has a physical condition, that has been added. Significant.
I cant do it anymore. Shes in good spirits, and is pretty mild tempered.
I have help, bc I work full time. The cost has become astronomical. People in my house 24-7 has been illuminating, in mostly negative ways.
Any advice on the transition?
And any advice on one specific aspect of caregiver burnout? Have had an over-riding sensation of total numbness. Or, very efficient compartmentalization thats so efficient it feels like numbness? Sometimes dont feel connected to myself at all.
Have googled this many times and still dont know. Assume its just survival paired with sleep deprivation. ?
I expect that to change.
At DU, is worth two in the wild. Thanks for my hearts! Always a fun time here in February.
Around minute 20:00, the VP stuttering and sweating through her questions. Great journalism.
This is so well done, wanted to share.
It's been happening everywhere in world, with Chinese infrastructure "investment". This is SA, but Central America, Africa continent, and Carribean...
Hello all. My sister suffers from MS (43). But it's been decently manageable.
She now has developed Trigeminal Neuralgia.
A friend of mine had it 25+ years ago, and I was quite active in his treatment. (Eventual surgery). My aunt also had it, also ultimately had surgery.
The gap in time between these other people treating it, and the current agony my sister is experiencing--- is a lot of years.
I know surgery is still very common.
The drs have her on gabapentin. And then, today, tapered steroids--for the week.
Has anyone here had exposure to:
These kinds of therapies?
Any 1st hand knowledge is very much appreciated! Im heartbroken for her. Such an awful disease.
Romania is home to one of the largest and most important old-growth forests in the worldbut its trees are disappearing at an astonishing rate. Meanwhile, a spate of attacks, and deaths, has shaken environmentalists and activists in the country. On episode 43 of The Politics of Everything, hosts Laura Marsh and Alex Pareene talk with the reporter Alexander Sammon, who recently traveled to Romania to investigate illegal logging for The New Republic. Can Europes forests survive the global appetite for timber?
Laura Marsh: In September, the reporter Alexander Sammon traveled to Romania to investigate illegal logging. He knew going in that there had been a spate of attacks on journalists and environmentalists in the forest. In 2015, an environmentalist named Gabriel Paun was beaten unconscious by loggers. The former minister of waters and forest was poisoned with mercury in 2017, after she tried to crack down on illegal logging. In 2019, two forest rangers were murdered, and in 2021, just before Alex arrived, a documentary film crew was ambushed in their car by a group of 15 armed men.
Laura: A lot of people might not understand why the stakes are so high: why there are these attacks, why its so fraught. What is at stake in clearing the last of the old-growth forests?
Alexander: Theres a lot of money on the linethats one thing. There are huge multinational timber corporations, and there are furniture companies like Ikea, which happens to be the largest private landowner in Romania. They all have a lot riding on those trees becoming things like chairs and particleboard and bed frames and the like. On the other side, you have the European Union and its climate commitments and biodiversity commitments, which are, I think, less prominent and less widely known. Those forests are extremely important because theyre not only the most effective carbon capture method on the planetthe old-growth forest captures carbon at this incredible rate thats not seen in logged and replanted forestsbut they also serve as an ecosystem for bears and lynx and other endangered or threatened species.
Near end of interview:
Laura: I never like to ask how individual people can react to discovering this kind of informationI dont like talking about the way consumers can vote with their dollar and not buy from Ikea. But if you are in Ikea and youre shopping for furniture, can you even find out what came from Romania and what didnt?
Alexander: Its really hard to tell. Its actually almost impossible. If you were to go to Ikea right now and look at whats on the shelves there in the stockroom, the furniture pieces will say, Made in Romania, Made in Poland, Made in Russia, but that only tells you the last link of the chain: It shows you where they assembled the pieces and put them together. It doesnt tell you where the wood is coming from, and that information is not publicly available.
Alex: You were tipped off to these codes that could help someone to figure out the source of the wood in this furniture, and you actually went to an Ikea and found furniture that could be sourced to a particular company. Tell me about the company it could be sourced to.
Alexander: I was tipped off to this one code that corresponds to Plimob, which is a Romanian-based manufacturer. Its not owned by Ikea, but something between like 96 and 98 percent of their product goes to Ikea. I was tipped off with their code, and I took it with me on the way down to the Ikea here in Brooklyn. I looked through the chairs, trying to find if I could identify something that had come from there. Sure enough, after a little while, I found a handful of them that had that multiple-digit code that indicated that they come from that particular company. That company, Plimob, had recently been implicated in sourcing illegally logged wood for its chairs. The information is there, but its certainly not publicly available. As a consumer, theres almost no way you could expect to find those things out and act or shop accordingly.
And the port conditions of course.
More info in the supply chain.
If everybody is "an independent contractor " when they don't want to be, why are companies suprised when people dont show under adverse conditions?. Reminds me of an article at Utne reader, from 10 years ago, on distribution/warehouse workers.
For the past dozen years, Omar Alvarez has been a key link in the nations supply chain. Hes one of some 12,000 truckers who haul the containers from the adjacent ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (where 40 percent of all the ship-borne imports to the United States arrive) to the immense complex of warehouses 50 miles east of L.A., where the goods are unpacked, resorted, put back on other trucks, and sent to all the Walmarts, Targets, and the like within a thousand-mile radius.
Alvarez works for one of the largest trucking companies at the ports, XPO Logistics, but XPO insists that Alvarez and his fellow truckers arent really employees. As far as XPO is concerned, theyre independent contractors and it treats them as suchthough they drive XPO trucks they lease from the company or its adjuncts and cant use those trucks for any other jobs. As independent contractors, they receive no benefits and arent covered by minimum-wage statutes. They must pay for their gas, maintenance, rig insurance, and repairs themselves; and, ever since the pandemic clogged the ports with more goods than ever before, theyve had to wait in lines for as long as four to six uncompensated hours before they can access a container and get it on the road. If they get in the wrong line at the port, they literally cant get out, surrounded by other trucks and doomed to waste more time. Many ports dont even provide bathrooms for waiting truckers, because they arent port employees.
According to a 2019 study by the Labor Center at the University of California, Berkeley, the median annual pre-tax income of Alvarez and his fellow port truckers, once their expenses are factored in, is a munificent $28,000.
We have no health insurance, Alvarez says. Like the majority of port truckers, hes an immigrant who doesnt qualify for Medicaid. When I need to see a doctor, he says, I drive [not in his truck] to Tijuana.
Perhaps one-fifth of port truckers actually are independent contractors; nearly everyone else is, like Alvarez, misclassified as independents. Over the past decade, dozens of lawsuits from misclassified drivers have resulted in judgments affirming that theyve been misclassified and awarding them compensation from the companies that misclassified them. XPO recently paid a $30 million fine to a large number of its drivers. But neither XPO nor any of the other fined companies have stopped misclassification. Its cheaper for them to pay a fine than to pay their drivers a living wage.
Not surprisingly, given the long waits and meager rewards, a lot of drivers have simply stopped showing up. According to Gene Seroka, the executive director of the Port of L.A., fully 30 percent of the ports 12,000 drivers no longer show up on weekdays, a percentage that rises to 50 percent on weekends. Once the waits exceed six hours, as they now sometimes do, drivers would run the risk of exceeding the 11-hour federal limit on trucker workdays if they then were to actually get a loadwhich means the port must turn them away, and theyll have spent an entire workday for no pay at all.
Here's her info.
THREAD on Sinema:
Sinema's behavior has made no common sense to me. Surely she knows too that she would lose in the 2024 Democratic primary. Why would she do it?
I have info from an inside source who lives in AZ and has a direct connection. With his permission am sharing.
First, and this likely isn't breaking news to anyone: Sinema has a highly overinflated ego. She believes since she has been able to work her way up, and accumulate so many academic degrees in a short time, she is a true super star -head and shoulders above intellectually.
To Sinema, as many of us suspected, her term in the U.S. Senate, she believes is just a stopping ground for her next step. She doesn't assume she will need to be re-elected.
This is something I imagined, but assumed she would be a consultant or something of that variety.
But nope, I was wrong. That isn't what Sinema believes will be her next step. With her inflated ego and small circle of friends, many of whom she has alienated and lost, not pushing back, she has been living in an echo chamber. The big $$$ corp donors are happy to feed this.
Sinema believes she will be running to President in 2024 I am told. This self-styled bipartisanship she believes she speaks for, will be her brand to run as the candidate in the middle. Not far-left of far-right. She has convinced herself this is her calling and she has it.
And you can see why having alienated so many close to her, & believing she is smarter than everyone else in DC and beyond, and with the corporate donors feeding this too while she tows their line, this misguided fantasy can be her view.
This I am told is what is happening.
One postscript per my friend: Sinema believes MAGA elected officials will reject partisanship when they are given a choice of her or Trump.
Yes, the land of magical thinking. But here we are folks!
A little more at the link.
Not good with linking images.
Essentially Images of:
Masked People are "more outraged, together"
Masked + Maga people are "more ad revenue, together"
Maga are "more disinformed, together"
That middle one tho...
Profile InformationGender: Female
Home country: usa
Current location: ohio
Member since: Thu Mar 5, 2020, 01:11 PM
Number of posts: 1,164