Bucky
Bucky's JournalCongratulations DUers. You saw some history today
And it wasn't bad history, for once.
In one day the political landscape changed a little bit cause one low level staffer with a lot of access from Trump White House finally stood up, found her voice, and told the truth that a bunch of powerful corrupt men have been scrambling to hide for the last 18 months.
This is what they mean by the long, slowly bending moral arc of the universe. It doesn't bend on its own--people have to show up, keep the faith, and keep pushing for a better world. But today, you saw the truth take a little step into the light where we can all appreciate it.
The best way to honor the rare privilege of having witnessed a good day in history, a good day in a sea of bad news days in the encroaching right wing sociopathic efforts of a neo-fascist elite... the best way to honor this little ray of sunlight is to get motivated and go out and fight like hell for the next 4½ months. Donate, volunteer, and fight fight fight.
90% of the pro-Trump GOP gives me the abused spouse vibe
They protect Trump and go along with his abusive, dish-throwing, driver's wheel-grabbing, tantrum-throwing insanity because they feel trapped in a partnership with him. Anyone who dares to cross him gets on his shit list, and they stay sobbing in the corner, quivering in his shadow, until he's finally too old and feeble to hurt them anymore.
These hearings won't help Republicans get past their psychological dependence on the rage-oholic abuser daddy. It'll just give them a brief pause before they transfer their pathetic codependence over to DeSantis, who's also a bullying monster. That's just the type they go for.
Five types of gun laws the Founding Fathers loved (They came for our guns!)
https://theconversation.com/five-types-of-gun-laws-the-founding-fathers-loved-85364#1: Registration
Today American gun rights advocates typically oppose any form of registration even though such schemes are common in every other industrial democracy and typically argue that registration violates the Second Amendment. This claim is also hard to square with the history of the nations founding. All of the colonies apart from Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania, the one colony in which religious pacifists blocked the creation of a militia enrolled local citizens, white men between the ages of 16-60 in state-regulated militias. The colonies and then the newly independent states kept track of these privately owned weapons required for militia service. Men could be fined if they reported to a muster without a well-maintained weapon in working condition.
#2: Public carry
The modern gun rights movement has aggressively pursued the goal of expanding the right to carry firearms in public.
The American colonies inherited a variety of restrictions that evolved under English Common Law. In 18th-century England, armed travel was limited to a few well-defined occasions such as assisting justices of the peace and constables. Members of the upper classes also had a limited exception to travel with arms. Concealable weapons such as handguns were subject to even more stringent restrictions. The city of London banned public carry of these weapons entirely.
The American Revolution did not sweep away English common law. In fact, most colonies adopted common law as it had been interpreted in the colonies prior to independence, including the ban on traveling armed in populated areas. Thus, there was no general right of armed travel when the Second Amendment was adopted, and certainly no right to travel with concealed weapons. Such a right first emerged in the United States in the slave South decades after the Second Amendment was adopted. The market revolution of the early 19th century made cheap and reliable hand guns readily available. Southern murder rates soared as a result.
In other parts of the nation, the traditional English restrictions on traveling armed persisted with one important change. American law recognized an exception to this prohibition for individuals who had a good cause to fear an imminent threat. Nonetheless, by the end of the century, prohibiting public carry was the legal norm, not the exception....
more at link: The best is #5 that details how the Founding Fathers engaged in gun confiscation for citizens who wouldn't take a loyalty oath to the new nation
So, who is Ron Johnson aide Sean Riley?
Before Ron Johnson hangs Sean Riley out to dry, I'd like to know who this clown is.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5020677/jan-6-cmte-wisconsin-senator-ron-johnson-sought-hand-alternate-slate-electors-vp-pence
Now this is categorically a criminal act, so long as the person handing the documents along knows what's in the envelope. And Johnson is obviously going to pretend he didn't know what was in the envelope. I imagine Sean Riley will also feign ignorance.
The chain of custody goes like this, with the names in bold print being people who obviously had to know that what was in the envelope was evidence of (and participation in) a criminal act:
fake electors => fake electors' notary public => fake electors' courier => someone in Johnson's office => possibly Ron Johnson => someone else in Johnson's office and who knew how to route this fake elector documentation => Sean Riley
Feigning ignorance is a critical feature of the Republican lifestyle. Whoever directed Riley to hand the envelope over to pence's office is part of the criminal conspiracy. Riley either had to know this was an election subverting document or got directed to text the arrangements for the handover by someone who knew this was criminal behavior.
This is what cops mean when they discuss who "got left holding the bag." Riley will have to say who set him up, naming names, or fall on his sword. This lands at Johnson's feet. Did he direct someone to participate in a criminal conspiracy or did he hire a staffer who participated in that criminality? Riley and Johnson are now in a position to point fingers at each other.
All I've been able to find out from googling so far is that Sean Riley is probably a former aide to Donald Trump.
https://mobile.twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1539310584012984321
Does anyone else know stuff about him?
The actual criminal charges
From the Just Security blog, these are the likely criminal charges against the Trump conspirators:
Federal
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of congressional proceedings
Whoever corruptly . . . obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
If two or more persons conspire . . . to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
18 U.S.C. § 494 Contractors bonds, bids, and public records
Whoever falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any bond, bid, proposal, contract, guarantee, security, official bond, public record, affidavit, or other writing for the purpose of defrauding the United States; or . . .Whoever transmits to, or presents at any office or to any officer of the United States, any such false, forged, altered, or counterfeited writing, knowing the same to be false, forged, altered, or counterfeited Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
52 U.S.C. § 20511(2)(b)
A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair impartially conducted election process, by the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held, shall be fined in accordance with title 18.
18 U.S.C. § 1001 Statements or entries generally
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title.
There's also an ongoing Georgia state criminal investigation in Fulton County, which has included the fake electors to see if they knew they were part of a plot to intimidate election officials or if they're just patsies. A county Grand Jury was appointed last month to refer any possible charges
Finally there's a pending civil action in Wisconsin filed on behalf of two legitimate Electors against 10 "alternate" Electors and Trump campaign attorneys James R. Troupis and Kenneth Chesebro, who "coordinated the nuts-and-bolts of the process on a state-by-state level, which involved multiple planning calls between Trump campaign officials and GOP state operatives."
This overall scheme is charged to have violated various state and federal laws, including:
It's gonna be a busy summer, yall
I like how Congresspeople are lining up to honor Shae Moss & Lady Ruby
She represents everyone who works to protect our democracy
We all owe her
Missouri Senate candidate, a disgraced ex-Gov'r, promotes RINO hunting permits
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/eric-greitens-tells-supporters-to-hunt-political-opponents-in-new-adEric Greitens, the disgraced former governor of Missouri seeking political redemption in a MAGA-fied U.S. Senate bid, released a campaign ad Monday advertising a hunting permit for his political opponents so-called RINOs, or Republicans in Name Only.
Im Eric Greitens, Navy SEAL, and today were going RINO hunting, Greitens says in the ad though hes not actually a SEAL anymore.
The ad then pans to Greitens joining several men with military fatigues on the front porch of a house. One of them uses a battering ram to knock down the door, followed by the deployment of a flash-bang grenade.
{...snip...}
Greitens resigned the governorship in 2018 amid allegations that at various times he bound, photographed, sexually assaulted and blackmailed a woman. Greitens acknowledged having an extra-marital affair but denied the allegations of assault and blackmail.
No charges were filed in the case, but a Republican-led committee in the Missouri house found evidence that Greitens engaged in multiple acts constituting crimes, misconduct, and acts of moral turpitude, both in the alleged sexual assault case, and in another scandal involving a Greitens fundraising effort.
Profile Information
Name: Mister ReaGender: Male
Hometown: Houston
Home country: Moon
Current location: afk
Member since: 2002
Number of posts: 54,087